Hey Everyone!
I went to the range yesterday to put some rounds through my new CZ 75BD. I also took our Sig Sp2022.
I have to say that the accuracy is as good as everyone says it is! It made me look way better than I actually am. You can easily fit a group inside the bullseye once you adjust to the sight picture.
Unfortunately, there wasn't much else that made me say, "This is why everyone wants one." Maybe I'm just not a CZ man, but here is some of the concerns I have as to why it may not be the 9mm for me.
1. The heaviness of the gun didn't seem to absorb recoil in any more noticeable of a way than my Sig. But it did make my arms tired after a few magazines.
2. Sight picture is small for me. I painted the dots a white/red combo to try to see better and it helped, but I still feel like I am struggling. I don't have the best of eyesight.
3.The little things are starting to add up. As I was cleaning both guns last night, there were so many little things I thought of and noticed. The slide is narrow and difficult to manage. You need a tool or the very strong fingers to strip it down. Aftermarket sights are limited and most need to be sent to CZ to install. No accessory rail. Magazines and other accessories are pricey.
So, I'm torn. I really want to love this gun and make it my own. But maybe it should go to someone who appreciates it and likes it for what it is. I'm not trying to bash CZ. There is enough evidence supporting they are high quality firearms.
I might be open to selling it trading for another 9mm. I like two-tone pistols and would be really interested in a FNP-9 two tone. I'm open to offers though.
I'm in Napa County.
Please, do not rant about how great CZ is and I'm stupid. I agree. They are great, but maybe not for me.
If you have suggestions to help me enjoy it more, I'm up for it.
I went to the range yesterday to put some rounds through my new CZ 75BD. I also took our Sig Sp2022.
I have to say that the accuracy is as good as everyone says it is! It made me look way better than I actually am. You can easily fit a group inside the bullseye once you adjust to the sight picture.
Unfortunately, there wasn't much else that made me say, "This is why everyone wants one." Maybe I'm just not a CZ man, but here is some of the concerns I have as to why it may not be the 9mm for me.
1. The heaviness of the gun didn't seem to absorb recoil in any more noticeable of a way than my Sig. But it did make my arms tired after a few magazines.
2. Sight picture is small for me. I painted the dots a white/red combo to try to see better and it helped, but I still feel like I am struggling. I don't have the best of eyesight.
3.The little things are starting to add up. As I was cleaning both guns last night, there were so many little things I thought of and noticed. The slide is narrow and difficult to manage. You need a tool or the very strong fingers to strip it down. Aftermarket sights are limited and most need to be sent to CZ to install. No accessory rail. Magazines and other accessories are pricey.
So, I'm torn. I really want to love this gun and make it my own. But maybe it should go to someone who appreciates it and likes it for what it is. I'm not trying to bash CZ. There is enough evidence supporting they are high quality firearms.
I might be open to selling it trading for another 9mm. I like two-tone pistols and would be really interested in a FNP-9 two tone. I'm open to offers though.
I'm in Napa County.
Please, do not rant about how great CZ is and I'm stupid. I agree. They are great, but maybe not for me.
If you have suggestions to help me enjoy it more, I'm up for it.


Comment