I'd like to address a couple of concerns I have with your comments.
Sig admittedly had issues with the first lines of their 1911 that were introduced several years ago. They willingly repaired/replaced parts and pieces on those flawed guns.
You now come onto the www and bring this problem to light 5 years after you got the pistol back from the Sig gunsmith shop. Why weren't those issues you mention above addressed at the time you got the pistol returned to you?
As noted in an above post, Sig has never gone after the "high end" 1911 market. They have produced competitvely priced 1911s from the beginning.
There were problems, Sig fixed them and went on to refine the line and make the 1911 line into one of the most under-rated 1911s on the market today.
The biggest concern I get from my customers who buy the Sig 1911s now is because of the tighter tolerances they take a few hundred rounds to get broken in. Hardly something to have an issue with.
Sig admittedly had issues with the first lines of their 1911 that were introduced several years ago. They willingly repaired/replaced parts and pieces on those flawed guns.
You now come onto the www and bring this problem to light 5 years after you got the pistol back from the Sig gunsmith shop. Why weren't those issues you mention above addressed at the time you got the pistol returned to you?
As noted in an above post, Sig has never gone after the "high end" 1911 market. They have produced competitvely priced 1911s from the beginning.
There were problems, Sig fixed them and went on to refine the line and make the 1911 line into one of the most under-rated 1911s on the market today.
The biggest concern I get from my customers who buy the Sig 1911s now is because of the tighter tolerances they take a few hundred rounds to get broken in. Hardly something to have an issue with.



Comment