Greetings all.
I'm a new pistol owner and am in need of some insight and advice. I have owned my Kimber Custom II for about 3 months, and have run about 1200 rounds through her. I've been practicing every weekend that I wasn't on call, and shooting 45ACP FMJ is getting a bit expensive in comparison to how often I'd like to shoot/practice.
I've been considering getting the Kimber 22lr conversion kit but am concerned about failure rates and whether or not the conversion kit will allow me to practice effectively despite what is reported as less of a recoil.
My other option is to begin handloading my own ammunition. This would allow me to practice with full-power ammunition for approximately half of what i'm currently paying, albeit with a lot more labor involved.
I can see there are pros and cons to both methods. I'd like to know everyone's opinion, as well as support or arguments against either one.
Which would you purchase if you were in my position? Cheaper cost but more labor intensive? Virtually no labor, cheaper ammo, but reduced recoil/higher failure possibility? Possibly a third option that I'm overlooking?
I posted this previously on TheFiringLine with good responses, but considering that I mostly shoot at Richmond Rod and Gun, I figure this would also be a good way to meet local shooters who might be able to help me get set up (if i go reload).
I'm a new pistol owner and am in need of some insight and advice. I have owned my Kimber Custom II for about 3 months, and have run about 1200 rounds through her. I've been practicing every weekend that I wasn't on call, and shooting 45ACP FMJ is getting a bit expensive in comparison to how often I'd like to shoot/practice.
I've been considering getting the Kimber 22lr conversion kit but am concerned about failure rates and whether or not the conversion kit will allow me to practice effectively despite what is reported as less of a recoil.
My other option is to begin handloading my own ammunition. This would allow me to practice with full-power ammunition for approximately half of what i'm currently paying, albeit with a lot more labor involved.
I can see there are pros and cons to both methods. I'd like to know everyone's opinion, as well as support or arguments against either one.
Which would you purchase if you were in my position? Cheaper cost but more labor intensive? Virtually no labor, cheaper ammo, but reduced recoil/higher failure possibility? Possibly a third option that I'm overlooking?
I posted this previously on TheFiringLine with good responses, but considering that I mostly shoot at Richmond Rod and Gun, I figure this would also be a good way to meet local shooters who might be able to help me get set up (if i go reload).





Comment