Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Square guns....?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    XDRoX
    Veteran Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 4420

    Come on OP, one example...

    That's not a lot to ask.
    Chris
    <----Rimfire Addict


    Originally posted by Oceanbob
    Get a DILLON...

    Comment

    • #17
      XDRoX
      Veteran Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 4420

      Originally posted by Spirit 1
      Hi all!

      Of the many things I just can't figure out, square handguns sit near the top. What I mean are semi-auto pistols that look like they were cut out of various pieces of square bar stock then wire brushed & assembled. The sharp edges on slide and frame or most everywhere just don't make sense to me.

      Adding to this, sights [especially rear] that have sharp square edges & corners throughout, instead of the mfgr. making even a basic attempt to round them off. In many cases the rear sights are also very high and wide, far more than necessary.

      All those sharp square edges will be the first to wear, downgrading the finish. They won't help a bit holstering & unholstering. There's zero comfort factor. To me they just look like a cookie cutter design lacking aesthetics & ergonomics desired & necessary in a handgun.

      Is it just me???
      If you're trying to say that square guns like glocks are ugly, that's one thing, and perfectly fine. But if you're trying to say something like glocks have sharp edges and sites that are unnecessarily big or obtrusive you're wrong.

      Of course without an example of what you're referring to this is just a guess.

      Honestly it sounds to me that you don't care for the way certain guns look and tried to start a thread to justify it. But contrary to everything you've said, these guns are proven to be very functional for their use.

      Come on OP, tell us what's really on your mind.
      Chris
      <----Rimfire Addict


      Originally posted by Oceanbob
      Get a DILLON...

      Comment

      • #18
        Fishslayer
        In Memoriam
        • Jan 2010
        • 13035

        Originally posted by XDRoX
        Come on OP, one example...

        That's not a lot to ask.

        I gave two. I ain't skeered!

        Note I didn't say they were ugly either. Square is square. Not for me, but they do have a no nonsense look about them.

        EDIT: Speaking of square sharp edges on rear sights, I have a few S&W revolvers...

        And yes... G**** is a bad word!
        Last edited by Fishslayer; 08-25-2011, 10:47 AM.
        "He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog.
        You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart.
        You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion."


        Originally Posted by JackRydden224
        I hope Ruger pays the extortion fees for the SR1911. I mean the gun is just as good if not better than a Les Baer.
        Originally posted by redcliff
        A Colt collector shooting Rugers is like Hugh Grant cheating on Elizabeth Hurley with a hooker.

        Comment

        • #19
          Lead Waster
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Sep 2010
          • 16650

          Maybe OP is comparing the lines of modern semi-autos to the Ye Olde Revolver's of Days Past? Funny how semis are all about squares and rectangles, and revolvers are almost comprised entirely of cylinders (for obvious reasons!)
          ==================

          sigpic


          Remember to dial 1 before 911.

          Forget about stopping power. If you can't hit it, you can't stop it.

          There. Are. Four. Lights!

          Comment

          • #20
            Canucky
            Veteran Member
            • Dec 2007
            • 4265

            Originally posted by 451040
            If you cannot provide examples of what you are concerned about then I guess this thread is pointless.
            I thought the OP was talking Square and Sharp edges

            Comment

            • #21
              Baconator
              Bacon makes it better
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Jan 2009
              • 9547



              This looks like **** to me too.

              Comment

              • #22
                451040
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2009
                • 2169

                Originally posted by Fishslayer
                When viewing a collection of G***** I usually wonder how one tells them apart.
                Glock owners usually know how to read. Unlike _ _ _ _ owners.

                Originally posted by Canucky
                I thought the OP was talking Square and Sharp edges
                Of which handguns?

                Comment

                • #23
                  djleisure
                  Veteran Member
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 4734

                  I like this one; it's squarey.

                  ------------------------------------------------------------
                  iTrader protip: When I buy something from you and I immediately pay, then my part is done. That's all I have to do. You can leave me iTrader feedback and go on with your life. When I get the item, I will leave you iTrader feedback, assuming you've already done your part. See how that works?

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    1lowluv
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 946

                    My Sigma .40 is pretty square. Alot of the sigs are square with sharp lines as well. But there's a ton of guns that are rounded off too. I think most of the guns that I notice being "square" are the lower priced guns. Cost more to machine stuff round.
                    Cerakote and Stippling https://www.facebook.com/HammerGunWorx

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      HKMadness
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 5262

                      Waiting for op to say hes talking about glocks, so the fanboys can defend their messiah.

                      Saying anything less than positive about glocks is blasphemy to some around here.
                      You guys remeber that "glock exploded" thread, dont'ya?
                      Last edited by HKMadness; 08-25-2011, 11:52 AM.
                      Show your friends your 1911's and your enemies your glocks!

                      Say no to posers & wannabes.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        open3gunner
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 693

                        that ' s why they have guns that are for cocealed carry guns, all the corners are rounded off even the front and rear sight (check carry guns of kimber, and front and rear sights of dawson precision a lot of them are pounded off for these puorpose).

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          Spirit 1
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 591

                          No, I'm still not going to turn this post into a brands war, that was not the point. What I originally said, plus added info, is plenty obvious. It's explained real simply: I cannot understand why some guns sold now have all the aesthetics of a shoe box.

                          I do know one reason for this type of square styling by several manufacurers, and more each day: CHEAPER! That is, fewer machining processes, lots less final finish work.

                          I just don't much care for the finished results and wish all these manufacturers would give a little more artistic design & style bang for the buck. Personally I prefer many of the traditional styles with more flowing lines, or at the very least: round off the blasted sharp edges! I'm sure you guys have seen some guns that are re-done, I think it's called 'melted'? There the sharp angles are ground off and smoothed & rounded, often resulting in a much better looking, and even functioning gun. I don't at all care for the ones that look like they were built with a hacksaw & a flat file. I think that's a ripoff by the mfgr's trying to save every last cent in a highly competitive market.

                          But like I said, to each his own!

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            Spirit 1
                            Senior Member
                            • Jan 2009
                            • 591

                            Originally posted by open3gunner
                            that ' s why they have guns that are for cocealed carry guns, all the corners are rounded off even the front and rear sight (check carry guns of kimber, and front and rear sights of dawson precision a lot of them are pounded off for these puorpose).

                            Exactly! Others mentioned 'getting it' too!

                            I don't like some of the older 'pseudo-modern' attempts at Buck Rogers looking firearms, but there's miles of room for improvements from several companies. Seems like they owe their faithful fans a whole lot more than they're kicking out in their current production.

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              Fishslayer
                              In Memoriam
                              • Jan 2010
                              • 13035

                              Originally posted by HKMadness
                              You guys remeber that "glock exploded" thread, dont'ya?

                              Which one?
                              "He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog.
                              You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart.
                              You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion."


                              Originally Posted by JackRydden224
                              I hope Ruger pays the extortion fees for the SR1911. I mean the gun is just as good if not better than a Les Baer.
                              Originally posted by redcliff
                              A Colt collector shooting Rugers is like Hugh Grant cheating on Elizabeth Hurley with a hooker.

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                gatesbox
                                Senior Member
                                • Oct 2010
                                • 1860

                                aside from looks, I think your position is pretty pointless. I have both semis and revolvers in equal number. In so many ways a revolver is a more simple piece of engineering. Thus i find it pretty hard to consider the manufacture of semi's a crude operation. referring to the rough edges and laziness issue.

                                the only rough semi's that I would aknowledge would be perhaps some foreign slap together 1911 clones, or other eastern block semis, but I think even they have their place.

                                To this day my favorite carry weapon has been my Ruger LCP, the one that got away when I moved to CA... Square, flat, and easy to carry...

                                the bulk and thickness of a revolver is just as much as a drawback as some of the rough corners on a semi. LEA seem to be able to carry square guns everyday, in and out without encountering any of the issues you are raising...

                                conclusion, revolvers and semi's have their place.....if you want a nice pretty revolver there are many to choose from...
                                "Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1