Are handguns sold in CA today microstamped. For example, a Ruger MarkIII .22?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
microstamp
Collapse
X
-
no, the microstamping law is concerning the ammo shot out of a handgun. not the handgun itself.Originally posted by leelawBecause -ohmigosh- they can add their opinions, too?Originally posted by SoCalSig1911Preppers canceled my order this afternoon because I called them a disgrace... Not ordering from those clowns again.Originally posted by PrepperGunShopTruthfully, we cancelled your order because of your lack of civility and your threats ... What is a problem is when you threaten my customer service team and make demands instead of being civil. Plain and simple just don't be an a**hole (where you told us to shove it). -
No - the law passed, but no regs implementing it have been issued; there are specific legal problems with the patent.
Not in CA, though a bill proposing ammo serialization has been introduced at least once - don't recall if it has been more than once.
The handgun microstamping would, theoretically, mark thefired slugscases with identifying info.ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!Comment
-
I though the microstamping was only for marking the casings not the bullets themselves. IIRC the law would require firing pins and breach faces to have microstamping thus imprinting identifying numbers/letters upon firing on the spent case. Guess they never thought about revolvers. Something about proprietary technology with Nanotech having a monopoly is preventing the implementation of the law from what I remember. c goodComment
-
Whoops, you're right - it's a casing-marking scheme.I though the microstamping was only for marking the casings not the bullets themselves. IIRC the law would require firing pins and breach faces to have microstamping thus imprinting identifying numbers/letters upon firing on the spent case. Guess they never thought about revolvers. Something about proprietary technology with Nanotech having a monopoly is preventing the implementation of the law from what I remember. c good
Thanks - I'll fix my post above.ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!Comment
-
That's the same thing I heard too. Hopefully they will keep the patent on that technology for a long time.I though the microstamping was only for marking the casings not the bullets themselves. IIRC the law would require firing pins and breach faces to have microstamping thus imprinting identifying numbers/letters upon firing on the spent case. Guess they never thought about revolvers. Something about proprietary technology with Nanotech having a monopoly is preventing the implementation of the law from what I remember. c good
Yes you can have 2 C&R 03 FFL's; 1 in California and 1 in a different state.
Originally posted by Erion929Comment
-
Try a microstamping system in a 1911...I doubt it would fly, I would hope no reputable makers would put such a thing into a pistol, that would make another reason to only buy used
the cost of microstamping sure sounds like it would be expensive thoughGood saddles ain't cheap...and cheap saddles ain't good
I have a custom spur and western decoration business! http://www.facebook.com/pages/JH-Spurs/211804625565944 & http://www.etsy.com/shop/JHSpurs?ref=si_shopComment
-
Oh yeah, and firing pins would have to be changed out every thousand rounds or so as the stamping wears off.
I would very much like to slap the face of every single person who thinks that microstamping a firing pin is a good idea. Maybe, just maybe it would knock the tiniest bit of sense into their heads. Oops, there I go again thinking anti-gunners could possibly think rationally for a minute."The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
-Thomas JeffersonComment
-
See how easy it is to find problems with the idea?
Literally hundreds of people pointed out those problems - and more! - to the Legislators. That's one of the ways we know this law has nothing to do with safety or crime.ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!Comment
-
I would just change out my firing pin asap I really don't know what this accomplishes. I would hate to see someone prosecuted for their range brass littered at a crime scene because that's the only evidence they had for conviction however unlikely.Comment
-
Revolvers don't eject the cartridges automatically at crime scenes. And most criminals aren't going to stop and reload right there.I though the microstamping was only for marking the casings not the bullets themselves. IIRC the law would require firing pins and breach faces to have microstamping thus imprinting identifying numbers/letters upon firing on the spent case. Guess they never thought about revolvers. Something about proprietary technology with Nanotech having a monopoly is preventing the implementation of the law from what I remember. c good"If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature,
but by our institutions, great is our sin."
-- Charles Darwin
NRA Life, CRPA Life, SASS Life, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor & Range Safety Officer, FSC InstructorComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,867,234
Posts: 25,155,006
Members: 357,208
Active Members: 4,750
Welcome to our newest member, muddywatters.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 14017 users online. 131 members and 13886 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment