I'm looking to trade in my Beretta on a new gun but the dealer says they can't take it becasue it's not on the roster of approved firearms for sale. I looked at the list and they are right, it's not specifically mentioned but there is the 96G Elite 1A / Steel , 96 Vertec Inox / Stainless Steel, Alloy , 96 Vertec (Black) / Steel, Stainless Steel, Alloy, 96G Elite II / Blue Steel, Stainless Steel, 96 / Steel, Alloy, 96 Black Inox / Stainless Steel, 96 Brigadier / Blue Steel, 96 Brigadier Inox / Stainless Steel, 96 Inox / Stainless Steel, and the 96G-SD / Stainless Steel, Steel, Alloy. That's 10 different versions of the 96 that are listed and they are all the same damn gun. WTF ! Does barrel length and the color of the finish really disqualify my gun?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beretta 96 centurion not on roster?
Collapse
X
-
beretta 96 centurion not on roster?
Originally posted by JeffMThe road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Bad decisions by soldiers, officers, and politicians have lost wars, despite having "the same end result in mind" as the people who know better...
100 idiots are still idiots despite being on "my side"
Some people just don't understand that good ideas sometimes aren't.
Guns don't kill criminals, would have been victims do.Tags: None -
each different finish and length is a different firearm on the roster. Stupid, but there it is.
PPT it and you won't have any issues. -
"color" is one thing...but barrel length is a definite defining characteristic when it comes to what's "on the list" and what isn't. Does your dealer do consignments? If so they could take it in on consignment, sell it, and put the proceeds toward the new toy of your choice.
Originally posted by orangegloWelcome to failtown, population = you.Comment
-
Ok, so please tell me there is already a lawsuit addressing this in the works. I can see the purpose of the roster, safe handguns are important. But I'm pretty sure the same gun wheather blued or stainless will have the same result when dropped. This is so obviously a way to bilk money from the firearms manufactures it's not even funny.Originally posted by JeffMThe road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Bad decisions by soldiers, officers, and politicians have lost wars, despite having "the same end result in mind" as the people who know better...
100 idiots are still idiots despite being on "my side"
Some people just don't understand that good ideas sometimes aren't.
Guns don't kill criminals, would have been victims do.Comment
-
The fee is only a few thousand $ per gun so it's not like an amount of money that really makes a difference in the overall scheme of a state with a $88 Billion annual budget. I think that if they must do this then each receiver/action should be approved and not the superfluous features.Ok, so please tell me there is already a lawsuit addressing this in the works. I can see the purpose of the roster, safe handguns are important. But I'm pretty sure the same gun wheather blued or stainless will have the same result when dropped. This is so obviously a way to bilk money from the firearms manufactures it's not even funny.Using C Products 10 round magazines in my AR-15...just to be "safe"...Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,863,980
Posts: 25,113,672
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 4,732
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 6222 users online. 75 members and 6147 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment