Current privately owned ar pistol value.

[KaLiFORNIA]

Just wondering what a noveske Gen 1 diplomat pistol go for now? Probably won't sell unless I can get close to 5 figures lol

[superdave50]

Lol indeed

[morrcarr67]

Sent from my motorola one action using Tapatalk

[Dano3467]

Just keep it

[Quiet]

Just wondering what a noveske Gen 1 diplomat pistol go for now? Probably won't sell unless I can get close to 5 figures lol

Since the Gen 1 came out around 2009...

If it semi-auto with a "bullet button" style magazine release and it is not a RAW, then it's worth a CA felony. Because it's been illegal to possess in CA since 07-01-2018.

If it is a RAW, then it can only be legally transferred to a CA FFL dealer with an assault weapons permit or through an out-of-state FFL dealer or surrendered to law enforcement for destruction.
^NIB Novesks Gen 4 AR pistols are around $2500, so your used Gen 1 is worth less than that, to people who can legally acquire a RAW.

[CAsubject]

Or he could just have a fixed 10 round mag attached (with a fixed muzzle device), made it a straight pull by using a non semi auto bolt carrier group, or even separated the lower and upper and it'd be 100% transferable as long as it isn't a RAW




(I am not a lawyer, nor am I giving legal advice, this is my interpretation of California's net of worthless and arbitrary gun laws)

[KaLiFORNIA]

Was a question after a few drinks. Not going to sell, it's legal Karen. 🙂

[KaLiFORNIA]

Karen, not directed at anyone specifically

[Tere_Hanges]

Haha, OP didnt like the answers he received.

[pratchett]

Haha, OP didnt like the answers he received.

OP receives helpful advice directly related to question, including pitfalls that could land him in prison and multiple ways to avoid that.

Immediately presumes bad intentions and infers emotions not in existence.

Sigh. Never change, internet.

[hermosabeach]

Current market $750

On Paper work 25,000

In reality- worth what a cheapskate will pay

Used $750

[tacticalcity]

Or he could just have a fixed 10 round mag attached (with a fixed muzzle device), made it a straight pull by using a non semi auto bolt carrier group, or even separated the lower and upper and it'd be 100% transferable as long as it isn't a RAW




(I am not a lawyer, nor am I giving legal advice, this is my interpretation of California's net of worthless and arbitrary gun laws)

People always forget to mention that...glad that you did.

Unless it is banned by name, or fires 50bmg, it can be made to be legal.

OP, You can ignore almost everything people replied with except the above...and the warning that if not configured properly it is a felony. The comments about it's value are bull ____.

Here is an honest answer to OPs question. Stripped semi-auto lowers are going for upwards of $1000. They sell within minutes of posting in the market place. These are crap brands. Well, not crap but not as respected and coveted as Noveske. Lowers these folks paid maybe $100 for back when getting an AR pistol lower was easy. I suspect you could get $5K or more for your complete pistol right now. Since people are getting $3K for cheapy brand ones. Or at least ones with cheapy brand lowers. Heck, you might be able to get $5K just for the lower. One of my biggest complaints about what I see available on the market with regards to AR pistols is that the brand isn't the quality level I want. It's not on par with my regular AR rifles. Something that is high-end like a Noveske is a unicorn right now.

[walmart_ar15]

Honest question. Can someone here in CA currently buy a semi-auto stripped AR pistol lower through PPT and can then assemble a working semi-auto AR pistol and not run afoul of the CA AW law?

[Quiet]

Honest question. Can someone here in CA currently buy a semi-auto stripped AR pistol lower through PPT and can then assemble a working semi-auto AR pistol and not run afoul of the CA AW law?

In order to not run afoul CA assault weapons laws, it needs to operate using a fixed 10 or less round magazine that can not be removed without disassembling the firearm's action or that is permanently attached in the firearm's magazine well.

[lastinline]

Or he could just have a fixed 10 round mag attached (with a fixed muzzle device), made it a straight pull by using a non semi auto bolt carrier group, or even separated the lower and upper and it'd be 100% transferable as long as it isn't a RAW




(I am not a lawyer, nor am I giving legal advice, this is my interpretation of California's net of worthless and arbitrary gun laws)

If it had a fixed magazine (Compmag), and a featureless-type of muzzle device, could it then remain semi-auto?
I’m thinking it was back from SSE1, if it was acquired as new in Kalifornia.

If I’m reading Quiet’s post above correctly, that would seem to be the case.