AR Pistol Help

[Mute]

My original link is for OAL, but I've included the USCC one that includes both. It seems that ATF measures OAL from the shortest configuration including folded, but LOP by brace in extended configuration. This seems to all be based on the idea that the brace is an accessory and not mandatory to the operation of the pistol, although I don't see how a brace can be used for LOP under that premise. Note the use of "may" vs "will".

Then again, how many vendors do we see, including LAW Tactical, publishing images of their pistols with SBA3 and SBA4 without worry?

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/keeping-your-ar-15-pistol-build-within-legal-limits/

The one explaining ATF changing OAL to folded configuration:

https://blog.princelaw.com/2019/07/0...ilizing-brace/

And of course, you can count on the ATF just making crap up out of thin air also:

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/atf-suffers-rare-court-loss-in-ohio-short-barrel-rifle-prosecution/

[LookItsJazzy]

It is a Registered Pistol. Was drosed as such when I bought it in 2011 or 12 and then again when o.p.drosed it. I would put a Law folder with the Brace of your choice o.p. hope you enjoy it.

Dude thank you brotha! Looking forward to it!!!

[sigstroker]

My original link is for OAL, but I've included the USCC one that includes both. It seems that ATF measures OAL from the shortest configuration including folded, but LOP by brace in extended configuration. This seems to all be based on the idea that the brace is an accessory and not mandatory to the operation of the pistol, although I don't see how a brace can be used for LOP under that premise. Note the use of "may" vs "will".

Then again, how many vendors do we see, including LAW Tactical, publishing images of their pistols with SBA3 and SBA4 without worry?

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/keeping-your-ar-15-pistol-build-within-legal-limits/

The one explaining ATF changing OAL to folded configuration:

https://blog.princelaw.com/2019/07/0...ilizing-brace/

My point remains the same. The OAL issue is moot in this case. OP didn't mention a vertical foregrip. As for Law Tactical showing pics with an SBA3, they were either ignorant of the issue, had a stop in the brace as has been talked about, or just didn't care and figured that was the customer's problem.

I wasn't aware of the LOP issue until I bought my first brace, from Shockwave. The instructions explained it. The brace manufacturers know the deal. It's when a Law Tactical folder is added that people have to be extra careful about the LOP. As the other guy's link showed, ATF prosecuted that guy for what they thought was a QUARTER-INCH too much LOP.

[phdo]

AR Pistol Help

https://www.brownells.com/handgun-parts/recoil-parts/recoil-hardware/locking-buffer-tube-folding-adapter-prod122057.aspx

Maybe this adapter will be smaller.


Edit: Sorry, not for ARs.

[LookItsJazzy]

Question,
What ca compliant fixed system are you using with the law tactical?

[enorbit3]

Maglatch fngr.

However it's not ideal. To drop the mag I have to fold the stock, depress the button and pull the charging handle back. Then remove the BCG extension from the rear. Then push the button again while pushing the BCG back into battery. Only then can I separate the receivers and get the little maglock block out.

I think the AR maglock and Kingpin may be a quicker and easier to use system.

[petrole]

Law Tactical folder with Juggernaut HellFighter

Anybody run this configuration?
Is it even possible with the bolt extension plug thingamajig?

[enorbit3]

Literally the post above yours. It can be done but it's a PITA with the maglatch FNGR

[Paperchasin]

I think the FC Hook is a pretty decent fixed magazine solution. It works best with Lancer magazines