A lightweight 40 will do the same thing as the 357 Sig. A 135 grain bullet vs a 125 grain in the same case is going to be almost identical. The 357 Sig is in the same class as 9mm, 40 and 45. It's for short range defense against humans.
The 10mm and 9x25 Dillon are the next step up and probably better dedicated hunting rounds. It's also a trade off. Pure ft-lbs of ME doesn't translate to an efficient kill on game. It also needs to penetrate far enough. I don't think pushing a light bullet as fast as it will go makes for the best hunting round.
If I was stuck with a semi auto that had a 9mm size frame for hunting, I'd just go with 40 and adjust bullet type as needed. It would probably be sufficient for small/medium deer and hogs, but you'd have to get almost within bow range to make your shot count. In other words, not ideal.
I think the 460 S&W would make an ideal hunting handgun. It can use a wide variety of ammunition and is a couple steps above even the 10mm.
The 10mm and 9x25 Dillon are the next step up and probably better dedicated hunting rounds. It's also a trade off. Pure ft-lbs of ME doesn't translate to an efficient kill on game. It also needs to penetrate far enough. I don't think pushing a light bullet as fast as it will go makes for the best hunting round.
If I was stuck with a semi auto that had a 9mm size frame for hunting, I'd just go with 40 and adjust bullet type as needed. It would probably be sufficient for small/medium deer and hogs, but you'd have to get almost within bow range to make your shot count. In other words, not ideal.
I think the 460 S&W would make an ideal hunting handgun. It can use a wide variety of ammunition and is a couple steps above even the 10mm.


Comment