Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Kahr CM9 vs Shield

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #46
    sigstroker
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Jan 2009
    • 19365

    Originally posted by DNA
    Simple. $$$

    For the money, the shield is quite easily the best value subcompact 9mm pistol in Kalifornistan.

    Dan
    Fixed your post. The CM9, available in the U.S. of A. is cheaper.

    Comment

    • #47
      DNA
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2005
      • 1517

      Originally posted by sigstroker
      Fixed your post. The CM9, available in the U.S. of A. is cheaper.
      Nope. Still one of the best deals in subcompact handguns in all the US still. They're reliable, parts are accessable, magazines are relatively inexpensive, if something goes wrong requires a to to the factory, don't take forever. Not too mention they're backed by S&W.

      Heck where else can you find a sub $400 firearm that's as reliable, with aftermarket support in 9mm that's designed for concealed carry?

      Dan
      Originally posted by bigmike82
      That doesn't matter.

      If you believe in Liberty, you should believe it for everyone, not simply those whom you agree with.

      Comment

      • #48
        Rogue2215
        Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 110

        I have a PM9 with Crimson Trace Laser. This was for a replacement Kahr sent me for the P380. After 400 plus rounds in various new ammo and three trips back to Kahr(P380), they were going to send me a new P380 pistol. I opt for a PM9 instead.
        Glad to say it's been 450 rounds with no failures at all. Decent conceal pistol, light and flat. Long smooth trigger pull needs getting use to. I use the extended mag to get a better grip (and an extra round). Keep in mind that sometimes too small is too small to handle/draw IMO.

        Shield is good but not fond of the safety for the CA versions. Kahr is a smaller package.

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1