Tweet
the revolver bug has hit me...
arggg....can't decide.
arggg....can't decide.
-
-
Take the one that is not a ruger
Ruger are built like tanks but ruger should not get our money. S&W makes a great revo which will last longer then you and maybe you children. Get the S&W"Calling an illegal alien a "undocumented worker" is like calling the drug dealer hanging around outside your kid's school an "unlicensed pharmacist." -
+1 vote for the S&W
Ruger sold out to the antis. If it wasn't for the desire of a 10/22 for my kid or the Model 1 Ruger would have never seen a dime from me.Comment
-
The Smith is also a much better revolver....Comment
-
I'm biased towards the S&W. Picked up a 686+ 6-inch from a member here and the thing is awesome.Comment
-
A pictures worth a................ S&W
Last edited by chickenfried; 08-10-2006, 11:38 AM.sigpicOriginally posted by victor1echoComment
-
im going against the crowd and saying the ruger . I bought the gp-100 4 inch stainless slightly used so none of my $$$ went to ruger. I tried the S&W but I didnt like the look or the feel. Ruger is built like a tank and is really a great gun
Originally posted by Soldier415Originally posted by ar15barrelsNot everyone is so smart.
We need people who work at McDonalds too you know...Comment
-
+1 for the S&W (as far a the anti angle, didn't S&W cut a Faustian deal with the Clinton Admin = sell out too)Originally posted by SemiAutoSam
I agree the S&W is a nicer weapon (unless you are planning to drive nails with the butt of the revolver cowboy style, then definately go ruger ).
Pokey
Chivalry is not dead! Its just that now when a man puts his coat down for a woman, its to keep her from getting her back wet.
"If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck."
In tribute to Blackwater Ops
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -Ben FranklinComment
-
take a look at the tauras tracker. I have a 4" in .357 about 3k through it. about $150 less than the 686 nice grips, beter finish, factory port job. nice shooter 7 roundComment
-
S&W has gone through a couple changes of ownership. They were owned by Brits when they were doing that.Originally posted by Pokey+1 for the S&W (as far a the anti angle, didn't S&W cut a Faustian deal with the Clinton Admin = sell out too)
I agree the S&W is a nicer weapon (unless you are planning to drive nails with the butt of the revolver cowboy style, then definately go ruger ).Primary author of gunwiki.net - 'like' it on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Gunwiki/242578512591 to see whenever new content gets added!Comment
-
Which?
If you must have one,get the moon clip loaded 45acp.....S&W of course!(quote)"Glocks blow up, SIGs have a high bore axis, Beretta locking blocks break, Ruger is anti-gun, 1911s are unreliable, and HK hates you. Get over it."Comment
-
Get Both...and sell me the one you dont like for cheap ! (but for reals, cost not being a factor, go with the S&W)
Comment
-
i think i've decided...it's going to be a S&W 520.
Comment
-
And when they changed back to American ownership, they rescinded the deal, sent letters apologizing for the Brits, and published a number of full page ads in popular newspapers across the US apologizing and asking for forgiveness.Originally posted by grammaton76Comment
-
Rugers and S&W's are great but get the one that fits you best. I like the S&W 686 but the Ruger GP100 fits me like a glove so I go for that.Comment
There are currently 25750 users online. 29 members and 25721 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.
Comment