Love my Browning BDM. It's fits the criteria.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single stack 9mm long barrel recommendations
Collapse
X
-
Can you elaborate on a double stack feeding more reliably than a single stack? I have never heard that claim. Also you all keep on mentioning a lot of off roster guns the OP would have to put a lot of time and trouble in to finding.Originally posted by AreWeFreeRecommendation, get a double-stack, they feed more reliably and hold more rounds.
A Sig p239 is the same width as a Glock 17, 19, or 26. Sig P6 is the same.
The P220 mentioned is a unicorn and much larger than a Glock 19 in every dimension.
The Kahrs are a little thinner but taller than a Glock 19, much taller than a 26, though a little shorter slides.
Those S&W's are out of production, definitely heavier than a G19 and most likely larger dimensions.
I can go on but basically you're looking for inferior items, get a practical and reliable gun like a Glock 19/26, Glock 42/43, or S&W Shield.Comment
-
I agree re 1911.
Full size, if you want. Or Colt Commander (which is lightweight) or Combat Commander (which is all steel model). Commanders and Combat Commanders in 9mm are a joy to shoot, and the Commander was originally designed as a 9mm platform.
For a 1911 I would, however advise against going any shorter than the original Commander/Combat Commander barrel length, which is 4.25 inches (some manufacturers are/were making their versions of Commander pistols at 4.0 inches, which lends itself to potential reliability issues).
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Last edited by Colt; 02-08-2016, 5:57 PM.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,866,053
Posts: 25,139,118
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 3,937
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 6215 users online. 99 members and 6116 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment