Hey so,
the girlfriend scored a pretty good price for her LC380CA. She was attracted to its looks and appreciated how easy it was to rack the slide. She is also looking forward to the 9mm kit they say might show up before the end of the year. The LazerMax was a nice bonus ta'boot!
Despite all this, there are some disappointments.
First, there was a light scratch across the LC380CA logo. No real biggie, this will be a tool for CCW.
2nd, the magazine does not slide out terribly easy. Not even a good shake will dislodge it. At least for now...
Lastly, after cleaning her off, we hit the range where we experiences several failures to eject and one failure to lock to the rear ( during 100 rds). This was disappointing. We were using Fiocchi ammo. I hear its respectable but, could this have been the problem?
What are your thoughts, experiences?
Is this out of the ordinary? Do the LCs require a break in period?
Or, is Ruger just blowing it?
the girlfriend scored a pretty good price for her LC380CA. She was attracted to its looks and appreciated how easy it was to rack the slide. She is also looking forward to the 9mm kit they say might show up before the end of the year. The LazerMax was a nice bonus ta'boot!
Despite all this, there are some disappointments.
First, there was a light scratch across the LC380CA logo. No real biggie, this will be a tool for CCW.
2nd, the magazine does not slide out terribly easy. Not even a good shake will dislodge it. At least for now...
Lastly, after cleaning her off, we hit the range where we experiences several failures to eject and one failure to lock to the rear ( during 100 rds). This was disappointing. We were using Fiocchi ammo. I hear its respectable but, could this have been the problem?
What are your thoughts, experiences?
Is this out of the ordinary? Do the LCs require a break in period?
Or, is Ruger just blowing it?



Comment