After reading many threads here, it occurs to me, many calgunners have preconceived ideas as to how accurate most handgunners can shoot and at what distance.
I'm a old timer. I opened California's first Indoor Shooting Range that was open to the public back in the 1970's era. I sold it in 2001. I definitely was witness to many firearm transitions. Such as shooters being predominately revolver guys changing to semi-auto guys. Metal guns transitioning into plastic guns, etc.
One of my observations during many of these transitions was the closing of shooting distances. My range was 25 yards (75 feet). Back in the day, most guys shot at the maximum distance of 25 yards, and tried to shoot the smallest groups possible on bullseye style targets. By the time I sold my business, most shooters preferred to shoot at less than 7 yards at silhouette style targets and group size was not their intention, only hits.
I'm not implying that there is anything bad about this. I am merely presenting my observations of the transitioning from target shooting to combat shooting.
I shot competitively in many different types of handgun competition. I shot Bullseye, IPSC, USPSA, Silhouette, etc. I am very familiar with the different disciplines involved in each. And, of course, the different equipment required.
I would have to say that the predominate or preferred type of shooting I see on ranges today, does not involve much skill or discipline. The firearms are mostly semi-auto, plastic, striker fired type, chambered in 9mm and 40. The targets are very large and are shot at extremely close distance.
It is easy to profile shooter's skill and preferred type of shooting based on what they pull out of their shooting bag. I am not trying to insult anyone. The reason for the thread is, times have changed, equipment has changed, skill levels have changed, types of shooting have changed. And, all of this in what I consider a very short time period.
As with anything, there are exemptions to everything. There are shooters out there who are very skillful and proficient. I get a good feeling inside when I see guys who really make a gun sing, meaning perform well, making every shot count!
The next time you are at a public shooting range, take note of what equipment people have, and the type of shooting and skill level. It offers some interesting results. But, don't make the mistake of thinking you can profile handgun shooters and that all of them are incapable of shooting accurately. It's just their type of shooting they prefer.
I'm a old timer. I opened California's first Indoor Shooting Range that was open to the public back in the 1970's era. I sold it in 2001. I definitely was witness to many firearm transitions. Such as shooters being predominately revolver guys changing to semi-auto guys. Metal guns transitioning into plastic guns, etc.
One of my observations during many of these transitions was the closing of shooting distances. My range was 25 yards (75 feet). Back in the day, most guys shot at the maximum distance of 25 yards, and tried to shoot the smallest groups possible on bullseye style targets. By the time I sold my business, most shooters preferred to shoot at less than 7 yards at silhouette style targets and group size was not their intention, only hits.
I'm not implying that there is anything bad about this. I am merely presenting my observations of the transitioning from target shooting to combat shooting.
I shot competitively in many different types of handgun competition. I shot Bullseye, IPSC, USPSA, Silhouette, etc. I am very familiar with the different disciplines involved in each. And, of course, the different equipment required.
I would have to say that the predominate or preferred type of shooting I see on ranges today, does not involve much skill or discipline. The firearms are mostly semi-auto, plastic, striker fired type, chambered in 9mm and 40. The targets are very large and are shot at extremely close distance.
It is easy to profile shooter's skill and preferred type of shooting based on what they pull out of their shooting bag. I am not trying to insult anyone. The reason for the thread is, times have changed, equipment has changed, skill levels have changed, types of shooting have changed. And, all of this in what I consider a very short time period.
As with anything, there are exemptions to everything. There are shooters out there who are very skillful and proficient. I get a good feeling inside when I see guys who really make a gun sing, meaning perform well, making every shot count!
The next time you are at a public shooting range, take note of what equipment people have, and the type of shooting and skill level. It offers some interesting results. But, don't make the mistake of thinking you can profile handgun shooters and that all of them are incapable of shooting accurately. It's just their type of shooting they prefer.

Then maybe someday I can stop telling the chicks in lane 6 that the flyer was a warning shot.
Comment