Ruger GP100 vs Tarus 627****Update****

[FormerBiker]

I'm looking to get a .357 wheel gun to go with my Henry Big Boy on the range.

I've already read the debate on 4" vs 6" and the jury is still out but I'm leaning towards 4" due to versatility.

My question now is which brand.

Colt and S&W although great guns are pricey and I'm on a budget and own a Chief's special.

Not interested in single action, cowboy style and want double action with a comfortable grip.

This brings me to the pro and con of Ruger and Taurus.

I really like Ruger for the quality, looks, and feel and own a 22/45 which is a great shooter.

The Taurus is less expensive, has a compensated barrel but has weird grips.

So I would appreciate comments of those that own/fired either or both with your pro and con comments..

Thanks.

[Squidward]

Yes, Colt and S&W have become very expensive and some people will argue, 'you get what you pay for'. I have owned several S&W revolvers over the years. But no Colts; because the cylinder revolves the wrong direction .

I have a GP100 in 6 inch and an SP101 in 3 inch. Both are comfortable in hand and the triggers were (to me) better out of the box than the current S&Ws. The Rugers are probably over-built and I've sent many .357 magnums downrange without any issues. If you are so inclined, they are also very easy to work on.. This meaning changing sights, trigger and hammer springs. *see: Gemini Customs*

IIRC, they don't post a written warranty. But folks on the internet say their CS is great and they'll fix any issues for free. I've never had the need for repairs so I can't vouch for that info. . Overall, they are a solid performer and I'd buy another without hesitation.

[Sabby]

for me ...I went with the 6 since, I have other weapons for that "versatility" game and since it will get more use at the range / target on top with some reach to it wanted something different in my quiver ... Ruger are built like a tank more of a working mans gun... single action not bad. but I'm waiting for my wolf kit to tune up the dbl. action



DSC02572

[Old4eyes]

I own both. The Ruger is miles ahead of the Taurus. We had significant timing and lockup problems out of the box with the Tracker and it had to go back for repair twice. More that just reliability, the gun was potentially an accident waiting to happen.

The Taurus is lighter and the ported barrel helps with muzzle flip, more so with .357 vs .38 . The ports will make the gun louder to the shooter and a lot more muzzle flash if night shooting is a possibility. Taurus has interesting designs but their execution is really lacking. At the time we bought the price gap between them was much greater than what I've recently seen - the Tracker has gotten more expensive. The grips are funky looking but do dampen recoil.

I trust the Ruger, I always wonder if the Taurus is going to send a round into the forcing cone.

[Rainbow Bullets]

Ruger has a better track record than Taurus for quality you should try and find a used colt trooper some can be had pretty cheap

[llazyjs]

The GP100. You won't regret it. The things built like a locomotive. Made in the USA by Americans. Never had a problem with either of mine or my Super Redhawk .44 Mag or my Single Six convertible .22/.22 Mag. Never needed the warranty on any of them. Love the Hogue grips on them. Love Rugers revolvers but I regret buying an LC9 semi auto.
My wife has a S & W model 67 and it's a good shooting gun but I don't like the grips.

[bsg]

i wouldn't throw S&W out of the running yet. consider a S&W pre-lock revolver. the prices have continued to rise for these revolvers, but with patience and tenacity you can reel one in at reasonable cost. my mentioning the pre-lock version of the S&W revolver has everything to do with my personal preference; YMMV.

old and new Ruger revolvers are sound and built to last. along with consideration of purchasing a new revolver, consider an older Ruger as a candidate for purchase.

[FormerBiker]

Ruger has a better track record than Taurus for quality you should try and find a used colt trooper some can be had pretty cheap

You are truly blessed , my friend, if you consider $1500-$800 used cheep.

[RedFord150]

...This brings me to the pro and con of Ruger and Taurus.....

I have owned only 1 Taurus revolver. It is the only revolver that ever failed on me and had too go back to the factory for warranty repair. Once It came back, I promptly sold it to a dealer. Doubt I will own another Taurus product.

I have owned about a half dozen Ruger revolvers over the years. I still own 3 of them. All of the Rugers I currently own are 25 years old or more. Thousands of rounds and never had a problem.

The Ruger is the better value at any price.

[DTOM CA!]

I too was looking for a .357 but I wanted a 7 or 8 shot revolver. They are getting harder to find so I went and ordered a 627-5 S&W from Ammo Bros. It was more than I wanted to pay but they do hold there value. Take it from my experience spend the extra few bucks you will thank yourself later. I almost spent $700 on a used Tracker but ended up paying $900 for a new semi custom S&W. If you keep it 10 years it is like $20 something dollars a year. GL with your decision.

[DArBad]

Ruger GP 100 vs Smith 627......

I like them both. If you want a gun you could buy right NOW at a very modest price, get the GP 100. If you want a gun with more classic lines than the Ruger albeit at a much higher price, get the 627.

Functionally, they are equal I think.

[sargenv]

I bought a GP100 when I turned 21.. I shoot a 627 now and have not fired that GP100 in at least 10 years... it was good for me when I was firing at the 25 yd line, learning to handle recoil and not using it for anything more than punching paper.. the 627 is what I use for USPSA revolver division and is overall a much better revolver for what I do with it.. If I were getting another revolver now, I'd probably get the 929... 8 shot and cheap to load.. 9mm brass is everywhere..

[MyOdessa]

I am in the same boat. I am looking to buy GP100 and S&W 627.

I really like the idea of eight shot .357 Mag and I like the way 627 look, but I read quite a few posts about poor QC in S&W guns lately, there are also some indications that S&W may get rid of the lock, I just hope that Pro Shop guns will be the first ones. So I will wait and see, but most likely, I will buy Pro Shop 627 latter this year, or early next year.

Meanwhile, I will buy GP100 Match Champion with adjust. sights. Except for the huge lettering on the barrel and the grip, I really like it. Everything I have read about them is good, I have plenty of other Rugers and I like both build quality and Ruger's customer service, if I need it.

I'm not a fan of Taurus, I don't think they are in the same league, quality wise.

[dyson]

Op is talking about a Taurus 627 not S&W

[Nick Adams]

If I could only own one handgun, it would be a Ruger GP100, 4 inch barrel,
.357.