Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

SSE

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Nor*Cal
    Veteran Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 2687

    Originally posted by djflash
    Wrong. Be patient it's in the works.
    He was absolutely correct. You are the one who is wrong.

    Comment

    • #17
      neouser
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 1138

      Originally posted by djflash
      Wrong. Be patient it's in the works.
      Maybe for a very common pistol like Glocks and/or 1911's. I don't see the R&D going into uppers for a wide variety of pistols. I predict the roster being struck down before widespread SSE 2.0.

      Comment

      • #18
        BigPimping
        CGN Contributor
        • Feb 2010
        • 21473

        Only time will tell. By that point, I hope to be in free America.
        sigpic

        PIMP stands for Positive Intellectual Motivated Person

        When pimping begins, friendship ends.

        Don't let your history be a mystery

        Comment

        • #19
          djflash
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2011
          • 945

          Originally posted by neouser
          Maybe for a very common pistol like Glocks and/or 1911's. I don't see the R&D going into uppers for a wide variety of pistols. I predict the roster being struck down before widespread SSE 2.0.
          It's all economics. A single shot upper would only interface with a frame on the rails, hammer and locking points. Not actually that much engineering between a 1911 and a Sig or Ruger or Beretta etc.

          I appreciate your optimism on the roster lawsuit. You realize that even if the judge rules this year it's almost guaranteed there will be a stay pending the guaranteed appeal by CA.

          Comment

          • #20
            CAglock20c
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2011
            • 1038

            Chances are the roster is staying put another 3-5 years. And that's optimistic.


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
            "I'm just a peckerwood who lives in the hills with too many guns."- Bobby Lee Swagger, Shooter

            FOR SALE 01 Chevy Silverado Z71:
            http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s....php?t=1185601

            Comment

            • #21
              neouser
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2012
              • 1138

              Originally posted by djflash
              It's all economics. A single shot upper would only interface with a frame on the rails, hammer and locking points. Not actually that much engineering between a 1911 and a Sig or Ruger or Beretta etc.
              It's also economics when it comes to tooling and machining. Saying that the upper would only interface with a frame on the rails, hammer and locking points is like saying that all pistol uppers have a slide, a barrel, and a firing pin. While they all share similar characteristics, they are all built to different specifications. That's when you start looking at design, fit, tolerances, and functionality. It needs to pass the sniff test. If not, you could just make solid dummy uppers that you just throw on top of the frame.

              What you're asking for is someone to R&D an upper, create specific tooling for it, and then market it to one state. If they were willing to go through all that trouble, they would have just found a way to incorporate microstamping into their pistols and put them on roster. SSE was a California solution to a California legal problem, not a manufacturer solution.

              Originally posted by djflash
              I appreciate your optimism on the roster lawsuit. You realize that even if the judge rules this year it's almost guaranteed there will be a stay pending the guaranteed appeal by CA.
              Originally posted by CAglock20c
              Chances are the roster is staying put another 3-5 years. And that's optimistic.
              I'm actually predicting a good 7-12 years. I don't see SSE 2 happening before that either.

              Comment

              • #22
                CAglock20c
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2011
                • 1038

                Originally posted by neouser
                It's also economics when it comes to tooling and machining. Saying that the upper would only interface with a frame on the rails, hammer and locking points is like saying that all pistol uppers have a slide, a barrel, and a firing pin. While they all share similar characteristics, they are all built to different specifications. That's when you start looking at design, fit, tolerances, and functionality. It needs to pass the sniff test. If not, you could just make solid dummy uppers that you just throw on top of the frame.



                What you're asking for is someone to R&D an upper, create specific tooling for it, and then market it to one state. If they were willing to go through all that trouble, they would have just found a way to incorporate microstamping into their pistols and put them on roster. SSE was a California solution to a California legal problem, not a manufacturer solution.











                I'm actually predicting a good 7-12 years. I don't see SSE 2 happening before that either.

                You're probably right....but I [we] can optimistically hope, right?


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                "I'm just a peckerwood who lives in the hills with too many guns."- Bobby Lee Swagger, Shooter

                FOR SALE 01 Chevy Silverado Z71:
                http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s....php?t=1185601

                Comment

                • #23
                  rolotomassi
                  Member
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 128

                  Originally posted by CAglock20c
                  Chances are the roster is staying put another 3-5 years. And that's optimistic.


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                  Longer if Gavin Newsome takes the Governorship.

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    franklinarmory
                    Vendor/Retailer
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 1892

                    Two things on this:
                    1. We currently offer SSE2 AR pistols to California. Cal-DOJ has been notified of our intent, and they declined to offer an opinion. Distributors such as Sports South and Bill Hicks are carrying the product. We also have many direct dealer customers carrying (or will be carrying soon) the SSE2 pistols.

                    2. We could easily make tilting barrel pistols for CA if the demand was prevalent and the mainline manufacturers (e.g. Glock, S&W, Ruger, etc.) would offer the virgin frames to us. I have asked some of the big boys if they'd like to work with us on this, and so far no one is interested. Smaller companies (with good product) like Lone Wolf will play ball, but I'm not sure if that would translate well enough to make it worth while to jump into the project.
                    sigpic
                    www.franklinarmory.com
                    info@franklinarmory.com
                    ONLINE STORE: http://franklinarmory.com
                    Franklin Armory - Manufacturer of Quality, California Legal AR's, the F17 Series rimfire rifles in 17 WSM, the Drop-in Fixed Magazine (DFM), and the CA7, CA11, and CA12 Rostered AR Pistols!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1