Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

1-6x vs 4-14x acss at 100 yards

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • itguy510
    Junior Member
    • May 2014
    • 39

    1-6x vs 4-14x acss at 100 yards

    Does anyone have pictures down scope of 1-6x and 4-14x at different powers for comparison at 100 yards (preferably)? I already have a 1-6x acss gen1 but thinking about upgrading to the 4-14x acss when it is released. I will mostly be plinking at 100 yards with my AR15 and wanted something that I could see bullet holes with scope.
    Last edited by itguy510; 10-15-2014, 5:47 PM. Reason: Spelling
  • #2
    Biggins151
    Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 200

    This was closer to 90 yards but furthest I could walk back at the park by my house. The little red dots out of focus at 14x are 1" big. It was hard for to get the Iphone camera still enough to get the reticle to focus at the lowest setting but its clear as day while looking through it.

    BTW it's up for sale.. here's the link to the post

    4x


    7x


    14x

    Comment

    • #3
      itguy510
      Junior Member
      • May 2014
      • 39

      thanks man! that is really helpful! I'm still on the fence about it. why are you selling yours?

      Comment

      • #4
        Biggins151
        Member
        • Feb 2013
        • 200

        I bought it then switched directions and wanted to get more into precision shooting and not just making hits on steel. I would be keeping it but I need the money to pay for the Viper PST 6-24 I'm picking up. That and I don't have another gun laying around to put it on. And if it stays laying around ill find myself justifying purchasing a whole new gun to put it on hah

        Literally opened, put on rings played with magnification and then wrapped up and put it back in box. Hasn't seen a single shot.

        Comment

        • #5
          PrimaryArms
          Vendor/Retailer
          • Jun 2011
          • 2676

          1-6x vs 4-14x acss at 100 yards

          Originally posted by Biggins151
          I bought it then switched directions and wanted to get more into precision shooting and not just making hits on steel. I would be keeping it but I need the money to pay for the Viper PST 6-24 I'm picking up. That and I don't have another gun laying around to put it on. And if it stays laying around ill find myself justifying purchasing a whole new gun to put it on hah

          Literally opened, put on rings played with magnification and then wrapped up and put it back in box. Hasn't seen a single shot.

          Why not just dial in exact firing solutions? Its designed to be fast and precise. Guys are getting way tighter groups including my self using chevron tip. I think if you stretch its legs further out and then get another scope you will find your self searching through threads to find another ACSS!

          -Dimitri
          Last edited by PrimaryArms; 10-17-2014, 7:08 AM.
          www.primaryarms.com

          Comment

          • #6
            Biggins151
            Member
            • Feb 2013
            • 200

            Originally posted by PrimaryArms
            Why not just dial in exact firing solutions? Its designed to be fast and precise. Guys are getting way tighter groups including my self using chevron tip. I think if you stretch its legs further out and then get another scope you will find your self searching through threads to find another ACSS!

            -Dimitri
            Because dialing in for wind that is continuously changing isn't the smartest thing to do. And doing wind holds on a scope that has hash marks every 1 mil isn't that easy either. So taking advantage of a g2 reticle or a Horus or the new ebr-2c or the reticles with smaller increments and "Christmas tree" like designs makes it easier to make those wind and elevation holds. Not saying this is a bad scope or a bad reticle by any means. It's just not optimized for what I am trying to accomplish, with the gun I'm putting it on.

            If I had the money to but a new scope and keep this, than I would. But unfortunately I don't have that much $$ laying around. I do plan on putting a 1-6 on my 16" ar once I can get around to it.

            Comment

            • #7
              PrimaryArms
              Vendor/Retailer
              • Jun 2011
              • 2676

              Originally posted by Biggins151
              Because dialing in for wind that is continuously changing isn't the smartest thing to do. And doing wind holds on a scope that has hash marks every 1 mil isn't that easy either. So taking advantage of a g2 reticle or a Horus or the new ebr-2c or the reticles with smaller increments and "Christmas tree" like designs makes it easier to make those wind and elevation holds. Not saying this is a bad scope or a bad reticle by any means. It's just not optimized for what I am trying to accomplish, with the gun I'm putting it on.



              If I had the money to but a new scope and keep this, than I would. But unfortunately I don't have that much $$ laying around. I do plan on putting a 1-6 on my 16" ar once I can get around to it.

              Holding changing wind using mils is complicated as well and why the ACSS system holds are set to mph instead yours giving up auto range, wind and leads. I get what your trying to do , it just seems like your giving up so much! Good luck.

              -Dimitri
              www.primaryarms.com

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1