delete

[audiophil2]

Based on what was said, explain how the wife ended up with the firearm and using it to qualify with. She said she had another firearm that she got instead. She said that her husband wanted it for himself. Then she ends up with it. You can guess, but unless all the facts are checked into, you just don't know.

Do you know when she last submitted a DROS? The CA DOJ can check to see if she could not buy another firearm, but you or I can not. If it is not reported, then it can not be checked.

I don't see a reason for the OP to not report what he witnessed to the CA DOJ and ATF. Laws don't work unless there is someone willing to uphold them. It would be quite interesting IF there were shenanigans going on.

If he is wrong then all he did was his job. Can't throw dirt on him for that.

[Coca-Cola777]

Husband and Wife and their both law enforcement? Don't be that way, let it go -our CA. gun laws are dumb enough as it is without every joe trying to enforce them, UNLESS it is dangerous to them or potentially to others, then yes, otherwise, let it go - just my opinion.

[Ron-Solo]

On aside note, there are several references to qualifying for their 1 of 3 for their CCW.

When active, I had to qualify with any gun that I wanted to carry, on or of duty. I was not limited to three, and never had a CCW permit per se. Under 830.1 PC I was exempt from the CCW laws, rather than permitted.

When I retired, my retirement credentials indicate CCW authorization as a retired peace officer. It is good for 5 years and does not list any specific firearm on it. I can carry anything I want. To comply with LEOSA for out of state carry, I must qualify with the same type of firearm (revolver, semi-auto, or both) once a year. It does not list a specific firearm and is a seperate endorsement card.

There are a lot of assumptions going on here, and my butt hurt detector is going off a little because the OP feels that DOJ is stealing people's guns.

Their agencies may require them to qualify with any gun they wish to carry and they may be sharing that particular gun.

[NorzelKid]

It is also a bit difference with a spouse, assuming that they are not prohibited, but if a spouse does to paperwork in order to get around the 1 in 30 or for other reasons, it could be a problem.

In this scenario, both husband and wife are LEO, right? Aren't active-duty LEO exempt from the "1 in 30 rule?"