Hi guys, I just recently ordered a New Frontier Armory complete lower receiver. It is going to be shipped to my local FFL but I know they make two versions, one being the California compliant model. Does that just mean it comes with the bullet button pre-installed? Is it an issue if it shipped without the magazine lock and I install itonce it arrives(already have it)? Just a little confused on the difference.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can a complete NFA lower without a bullet button to California?
Collapse
X
-
Depends on the recieving ffl, some ate cool some are dumb. but its legal. could be a rimfire build for all they know. or featureless.PRO PELLE CUTEM
"Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep forever"- Thomas Jefferson, 1785
Originally posted by bwieseGold standard is for idiots.Originally posted by J.P.MorganMoney is gold, and nothing else. -
It could be going onto a dedicated .22 rifle, and would not need a bullet button.
If it was a complete centerfire rifle, then you need the bullet button. Nothing needed for just a lower (even if it is complete).sigpicComment
-
-
It certainly can be featureless. Pin the stock and Install a grip wrap. Or, how about the fact that its NOT A SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLE. It's just a lower reciever. Not an AW, bullet button, pistol grip, collapsible stock or no.PRO PELLE CUTEM
"Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep forever"- Thomas Jefferson, 1785
Originally posted by bwieseGold standard is for idiots.Originally posted by J.P.MorganMoney is gold, and nothing else.Comment
-
You need to check with the FFL since some don't know the actual issues and think that it does actually need the bullet button.
A lower is not semi-auto, nor center-fire, so the restrictions don't apply until an upper is put on it. The same with the ban by name since that also requires it to be a semi-auto firearm.
You could make it into a bolt action, pump action, single shot, etc., as well as making it into a rimfire.Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
-
While this is correct in that the FFL should be fine with receiving it and selling it without the BB, it does not mean it is actually the case.
If you want to avoid problems, you should communicate in advance to insure that there will not be a problem. There are some FFLs who won't deal with AR type rifles. I don't know why, but that is their choice.
Some FFLs might think that it is illegal to receive an AR lower without the bullet button, which is not correct, but good luck trying to convince such a person, especially after they have received it. Remember, some people are not rational, even FFLs.
Consider the statements in this article:
California's gun laws are so complicated, even many police departments don't know how to interpret them. Case in point: the story of Mark Haynie.
Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,864,918
Posts: 25,124,973
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 4,210
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 7908 users online. 118 members and 7790 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment