DOJ going after Single Shot exemptions and Rebuild Kits?

[Bobby Hated]

just got back from PPT my railgun to a fellow calgunner, and the guys at the gun store we did PPT at were saying how the DOJ inspector just spent 3 days there, when they usually spend one day.

they said the DOJ was making a special effort to go after Single Shot exemptions and Rebuild Kits. DOJ wanted all paperwork on single shot exemptions so they could follow up with gun owneres to make sure they had not been converted back.

and they were also going after dealers for selling rebuild kits. DOJ apparently has decided by fiat that these are mags if all the parts for a mag are sold together.

anyone know anything about this or can comment from an INFORMED perspective?

thanks

[Bobula]

Nothing in law against either. Attempted underground regulation.

[tenpercentfirearms]

just got back from PPT my railgun to a fellow calgunner, and the guys at the gun store we did PPT at were saying how the DOJ inspector just spent 3 days there, when they usually spend one day.

they said the DOJ was making a special effort to go after Single Shot exemptions and Rebuild Kits. DOJ wanted all paperwork on single shot exemptions so they could follow up with gun owneres to make sure they had not been converted back.

and they were also going after dealers for selling rebuild kits. DOJ apparently has decided by fiat that these are mags if all the parts for a mag are sold together.

anyone know anything about this or can comment from an INFORMED perspective?

thanks

Who is the dealer so we can contact them.

There is nothing the DOJ can do to you once you take possession of your handgun as long as you do not create an assault weapon.

Furhter, there is plenty of documentation that rebuild kits are legal, so the DOJ would probably want to sent a reverssed opinion of their already written explination that rebuild kits are legal.

At this time someone is spreading FUD. It is either the dealer or the DOJ and it needs to be addressed. Please let us know who it is so we can contact them.

[AJAX22]

haha

yeah.... love to get more info on who that dealer was

Sounds like a bit of fud

[halifax]

If the DOJ "has decided by fiat that these are mags if all the parts for a mag are sold together", then the dealer broke the law and needs to be cited or arrested. Did that happen?

[alfred1222]

If the DOJ "has decided by fiat that these are mags if all the parts for a mag are sold together", then the dealer broke the law and needs to be cited or arrested. Did that happen?

Why would the dealer be cited or arrested?! if someone puts all of the parts of a 30rnd mag into a bag, and slaps a price tag on it saying that the parts are meant to rebuild pre-ban mags, he is legally selling parts.

[rromeo]

Reread the post you quoted.

[halifax]

Why would the dealer be cited or arrested?! if someone puts all of the parts of a 30rnd mag into a bag, and slaps a price tag on it saying that the parts are meant to rebuild pre-ban mags, he is legally selling parts.

If the DOJ "has decided by fiat that these are mags if all the parts for a mag are sold together", then the dealer broke the law and needs to be cited or arrested. Did that happen?

Well, if the DOJ decided they were magazines like the OP posted, then it follows that the dealer sold large capacity magazines to non-exempt people, doesn't it?

[kemasa]

Well, if the DOJ decided they were magazines like the OP posted, then it follows that the dealer sold large capacity magazines to non-exempt people, doesn't it?

Only if that is actually illegal (read the actual law).

[EBR Works]

Well, if the DOJ decided they were magazines like the OP posted, then it follows that the dealer sold large capacity magazines to non-exempt people, doesn't it?

So, you are saying that selling a bag of parts that would constitute a complete mag is not legal? Please elaborate how you came to this conclusion.

[halifax]

I am saying that if the DOJ is claiming that a bag of parts is indeed a complete magazine then they should have arrested the dealer or at least cited him. No?

They didn't which somewhat proves they are FOS.

[freonr22]

Tag

[EBR Works]

I am saying that if the DOJ is claiming that a bag of parts is indeed a complete magazine then they should have arrested the dealer or at least cited him. No?

They didn't which somewhat proves they are FOS.

Got it. Sorry, I misunderstood.

[halifax]

...

[winnre]

Funny how a bag of magazine parts are just parts but a bag of machine gun parts is a machine gun. Pick a lane!