DROS FACT OR DROS FUD?
BACKGROUND: It is legal for a Buyer to own/possess/operate any Cal-legal firearm in a legal manner. It is legal for the Buyer to own and use hi-cap mags for work/work-related training. The Buyer is an active LEO in good standing.
PRESENT DAY: There's a punched hole in the Buyer's Calif.DMV driver's license because at the time of renewal, a new plastic CDL was not issued at the DMV office and instead a 60-day extension on a DMV document (along with the expired hole-punched CDL) was issued in lieu of a new plastic CDL with instructions to present the document to any DMV office if the new CDL does not appear in 60 days. The Buyer recently and successfully applied for a US passport with the expired hole-punched CDL and DMV document of extension.
INCIDENT: The Buyer recently entered a well-known gunstore in SoCal to purchase a firearm and was denied because tthe store employee and store manager both told the Buyer that the hole-punched CDL and DMV 60-day extension was not an acceptable form of ID for DOJ and the DROS. Until the Buyer is in possession of the new CDL, the Buyer cannot DROS.
QUESTIONS: Is the gunstore's manager and employee telling FACT or FUD? If it is indeed FACT, where in CAL/DOJ or US/DOJ is it printed? If the US Dept of State and LEAs/LEOs accept it, then why not gunstores/Cal-DOJ/DOJ? Curious.
BACKGROUND: It is legal for a Buyer to own/possess/operate any Cal-legal firearm in a legal manner. It is legal for the Buyer to own and use hi-cap mags for work/work-related training. The Buyer is an active LEO in good standing.
PRESENT DAY: There's a punched hole in the Buyer's Calif.DMV driver's license because at the time of renewal, a new plastic CDL was not issued at the DMV office and instead a 60-day extension on a DMV document (along with the expired hole-punched CDL) was issued in lieu of a new plastic CDL with instructions to present the document to any DMV office if the new CDL does not appear in 60 days. The Buyer recently and successfully applied for a US passport with the expired hole-punched CDL and DMV document of extension.
INCIDENT: The Buyer recently entered a well-known gunstore in SoCal to purchase a firearm and was denied because tthe store employee and store manager both told the Buyer that the hole-punched CDL and DMV 60-day extension was not an acceptable form of ID for DOJ and the DROS. Until the Buyer is in possession of the new CDL, the Buyer cannot DROS.
QUESTIONS: Is the gunstore's manager and employee telling FACT or FUD? If it is indeed FACT, where in CAL/DOJ or US/DOJ is it printed? If the US Dept of State and LEAs/LEOs accept it, then why not gunstores/Cal-DOJ/DOJ? Curious.

. This has been very enlightening on how DOJ views things and what they require of the ethical and legit FFL/gunstore. But why a legit govt document extension+expired CDL is not a valid form of ID for dros is beyond common sense.
Comment