Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

PPT Deal Normal, FFL Not Normal?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roecar
    Member
    • Jun 2008
    • 193

    PPT Deal Normal, FFL Not Normal?

    I'd like to illustrate a situation as follows regarding a PPT through a LA based FFL.

    A rifle is purchased from one individual to another. A FFL is selected and both parties meet. DROS is started, paperwork exchanged everything goes as it normally should. For the seller everything is A-ok, for the buyer they are required to show proof of CA residence. A Driver's License is provided.

    Here is "situation" if any at all. The FFL asks the buyer for a second piece of proof of residency, i.e. utility bill, notarized note, etc... in addition to a DL. Is that normal? As I understand all that is needed is a DL as proof of residency since it is issued through the DMV. As such a vehicle registration form is provided and accepted by the FFL. The 10 day wait begins. On the 10th day, the FFL informs the buyer that the second document provided is no longer valid and requires a utility bill or notarized note of residency. Buyer is unsure what other documents can be provided since the DL and vehicle registration are in fact in order. FFL "owner" steps in and says "Don't worry about it, just give me your business and I'll write off the discrepancy"

    WTH? Tell me what just happened? I am lost.
    Originally posted by winnre
    833,315 years? Who is doing the work, CalTrans???
  • #2
    halifax
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 4440

    The CA DL would be all that was needed for a long gun if it was:

    Valid and current

    and

    Included the buyer's name, photograph, DOB, and current physical address as stated on the Form 4473.

    Some shops do go overboard.
    Last edited by halifax; 09-01-2011, 4:27 PM.
    Jim


    sigpic

    Comment

    • #3
      FortCourageArmory
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2007
      • 1001

      Only reason I can think of to require a vehicle registration is the address on the license was not the buyers current physical address. If that was the case, then a vehicle registration or some other "government-issued" document with the current address would be necessary. What the whole "On the 10th day, the FFL informs the buyer that the second document provided is no longer valid and requires a utility bill or notarized note of residency." is about is beyond me. We are from the "least amount of required paperwork" line of thinking here. Some FFLs are a little anal retentive I have found.
      sigpicNRA Life Member
      Tim & the gang
      Fort Courage Armory
      1518-B Los Angeles Avenue
      Simi Valley, CA 93065
      (805) 526-6563
      www.fortcouragearmory.com

      Comment

      • #4
        BannedinBritain
        Member
        • May 2011
        • 302

        It's LA...a.k.a. the twilight zone.

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1