Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

selling a black powder revolver

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • doc8404
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 86

    selling a black powder revolver

    I bought a black powder .36 cal revolver from an antique store. They told me that it was over a hundred years old so they could legally sell it with no paper work behind it. After researching it i found out it was made in 1973 and shooting it is proving to be difficult finacially. I am looking to sell it for what i bought it for but dont know if i will run into a problem since i was givin no paperwork behind it. I have no proof of ownership, its not registered and dont know if i will have problems selling it legally. Will I have any issues selling?
  • #2
    BannedinBritain
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 302

    Originally posted by doc8404
    I bought a black powder .36 cal revolver from an antique store. They told me that it was over a hundred years old so they could legally sell it with no paper work behind it. After researching it i found out it was made in 1973 and shooting it is proving to be difficult finacially. I am looking to sell it for what i bought it for but dont know if i will run into a problem since i was givin no paperwork behind it. I have no proof of ownership, its not registered and dont know if i will have problems selling it legally. Will I have any issues selling?
    Black powder guns (matchlock, flintlock, percussion cap, or similar type of ignition system or replica
    thereof, regardless of the date of manufacture) are not subject to FFL requirements...as long as they can't be readily converted to fire cartridges.
    Last edited by BannedinBritain; 08-07-2011, 12:31 PM.

    Comment

    • #3
      ironman5669
      Senior Member
      • May 2009
      • 1123

      i am looking for a b p revolver, got pics? and how much are you asking.

      Comment

      • #4
        r3dn3ck
        Banned
        • Feb 2010
        • 1900

        as far as the govt cares it's not really a gun. It's "primitive". Primitive enough to drive a bullet clean through a man but I guess that's not gun enough to be one.

        Comment

        • #5
          Librarian
          Admin and Poltergeist
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Oct 2005
          • 44652

          Originally posted by r3dn3ck
          as far as the govt cares it's not really a gun. It's "primitive". Primitive enough to drive a bullet clean through a man but I guess that's not gun enough to be one.
          Only for purposes of transfer without using an FFL - otherwise, restrictions on concealed handguns and loaded in public and where you may legally discharge it all apply.
          ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

          Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1