Yeah, it should, but things change over time, so you need to read the whole thread.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When CA FFLs should collect SALES TAX from consumers.
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein -
Also read the second post :-).Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
-
interesting ....sigpicComment
-
Looked through the thread and didnt see what to do in this situation.
Customer walked into a store in Washington and bought a firearm. Firearm is being sent to me for transfer to purchaser legally. In essence no different than an online purchase. However Washington store charged him sales tax. Does this effect or not effect our collecting of ca sales tax?Comment
-
The WA store should not collect tax on a shipped transfer. CA tax is due only.Looked through the thread and didnt see what to do in this situation.
Customer walked into a store in Washington and bought a firearm. Firearm is being sent to me for transfer to purchaser legally. In essence no different than an online purchase. However Washington store charged him sales tax. Does this effect or not effect our collecting of ca sales tax?Comment
-
You still need to collect CA sales tax. The WA store should not have charged him sales tax. It is really a business to business transfer, just like if he happened to call the place and paid for it over the phone.Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
-
When CA FFLs should collect SALES TAX from consumers.
That is exactly how I understood it too. I just wanted confirmation. I emailed them already.
Thank you,
Brett C.
IronworksTactical.com - ownerComment
-
So a little follow up. Got a phone call from them today trying to say because he walked in to pay its a wa purchase and not to worry because the receipt says he paid wa state tax already he won't be required to pay ca state tax. I told them that want correct and explained it's the same as if he paid over the phone. It's still be delivered to him in ca through an FFL.
Brett C.
IronworksTactical.com - ownerComment
-
It is not a WA sale as it was not given to him. It can take a bit to get them to understand. I went through that with a customer who stopped by shop in another state. They did end up understanding in the end.Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
-
Bass pro stepped in and told the customer they would do it as it's a grey area and no ca tax would need to be collected. Uh sure that's on them. I still think this should be treated as kemasa explained.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
That is funny as it is not a gray area. The CA BOE says that the CA FFL has to collect sales tax on a firearm if it is coming from out of state and the business does not collect CA sales tax.
The buyer did not take possession when out of state as the firearm can not be transferred to them.
Yeah, an employee can say that they will do it because things won't come down on the employee, but on the business owner.Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
-
I agree. I wrote the boe also and will post up what they say once it comes back.
Brett C.
IronworksTactical.com - ownerComment
-
Yes, for an out of state transfer.
For in-state, the selling FFL is responsible for collecting the sales tax on the transfer dealer's FFL fee, as well as on everything else.Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
-
Ok one more that I may have missed here. A firearm that is used and being transferred in state. For instance seller is in nor cal. They ship an FFL the gun directly so purchaser in so cal can do transfer through them. This is technically a person to person transfer so no tax but does it change since the FFL has go run it as a normal sale through the DROS system? I would think that wouldn't change anything because the FFL wasn't involved in negotiating the price, finding the buyer/seller etc.
Brett C.
IronworksTactical.com - ownerComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,861,332
Posts: 25,079,912
Members: 355,415
Active Members: 5,458
Welcome to our newest member, scentedtrunk.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 5987 users online. 29 members and 5958 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.


Comment