Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

SAME EXACT GUN..... DIFFERENT COLOR

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • THEDUELLIST
    Junior Member
    • May 2010
    • 13

    SAME EXACT GUN..... DIFFERENT COLOR

    Good afternoon. I am a new member here. I have a question for the FFL's out there.

    There is a particular Beretta PX4 Storm 9mm type F that I really want to buy. According to the DOJ list it is described as :

    PX4 Storm Type F / Steel, Polymer Pistol 4" 9mm 12/14/2010


    Beretta now has an "Olive Drab" version of the same EXACT gun. As far as I "seem" to be concerned, there is no indication of either the model number or the actual color of this gun on the list. I think this is a big grey area that can be challenged.

    The model I want is: JSPX001

    If this model can be shipped from a store/owner with 10 round mags, then wouldn't this pistol be California legal?

    Thank you all for your time
  • #2
    socalblue
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 811

    Originally posted by THEDUELLIST
    Good afternoon. I am a new member here. I have a question for the FFL's out there.

    There is a particular Beretta PX4 Storm 9mm type F that I really want to buy. According to the DOJ list it is described as :

    PX4 Storm Type F / Steel, Polymer Pistol 4" 9mm 12/14/2010


    Beretta now has an "Olive Drab" version of the same EXACT gun. As far as I "seem" to be concerned, there is no indication of either the model number or the actual color of this gun on the list. I think this is a big grey area that can be challenged.

    The model I want is: JSPX001

    If this model can be shipped from a store/owner with 10 round mags, then wouldn't this pistol be California legal?

    Thank you all for your time
    Nope. Current Roster rules require each & every version be certified ($$$). Big reason why there are active court actions for this very issue (Pena v Cid)

    Comment

    • #3
      Ballistic043
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 1704

      its so stupid its funny. look at this


      SW1911 SC / Alloy, Steel, Stainless Steel Pistol 4.25" .45 ACP 8/10/2011


      SW1911 SC / Stainless Steel, Alloy Pistol 4.25" .45 ACP 7/11/2011


      to the DOJ they are still two different guns. same caliber, model, and length though.
      Last edited by Ballistic043; 08-05-2010, 3:29 PM.

      Comment

      • #4
        THEDUELLIST
        Junior Member
        • May 2010
        • 13

        What arrogance that the "powers to be" have. The funny things is that we are not fighting the second amendment....they are! What a shame.

        Comment

        • #5
          kemasa
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Jun 2005
          • 10706

          A similar example is the Glock 17, the OD version is listed separately. According the law, similar firearms can be added, but I think the manufacturer has to pay for the listing, although not the testing. Hopefully the lawsuits will clear this up soon.
          Kemasa.
          False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.

          Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.

          Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein

          Comment

          • #6
            Capt. Speirs
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2008
            • 1232

            Stainless Colt Python on roster, Blue, not.

            It is about money, another form of tax, in my opinion. You are not going to convince me at all that it is about safety.
            _____________________________________________
            South Coast Outdoorsman
            2736 E Chapman Ave
            Orange CA 92869
            714-532-4867
            T - F (11 - 7pm) Sat (10 - 5pm) - closed Sun & Mon
            _____________________________________________

            Comment

            • #7
              kemasa
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Jun 2005
              • 10706

              It is not about money, nor is it about safety. It is about harassment and making it difficult to buy a firearm. If they could just ban them all, they would like that better, but otherwise they make it difficult and expensive too.
              Last edited by kemasa; 08-08-2010, 3:49 PM.
              Kemasa.
              False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.

              Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.

              Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein

              Comment

              • #8
                shotcaller6
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 677

                Hmmm.

                I don't quite grasp what you are saying when you say " If they could just ban them all, that would be better." Did I missunderstand?

                Comment

                • #9
                  kemasa
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 10706

                  The anti-gun people would like to ban all guns, but since they can not do that, they do what they can to make it difficult to get a firearm, as difficult as possible. Money is not the issue, but if you also make it expensive to certify the firearms, then less firearms will be certified (the joke being that police can carry "unsafe" firearms not on the certified list).
                  Kemasa.
                  False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.

                  Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.

                  Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Malthusian
                    Veteran Member
                    • May 2010
                    • 4133

                    Originally posted by shotcaller6
                    I don't quite grasp what you are saying when you say " If they could just ban them all, that would be better." Did I missunderstand?
                    Originally posted by kemasa
                    It is not about money, nor is it about safety. It is about harassment and making it difficult to buy a firearm. If they could just ban them all, they would like that better, but otherwise they make it difficult and expensive too.
                    Read a little closer. I almost read it the same way
                    "While it may come as a surprise to the authors of the legislation, most semi-automatic pistols do in fact come with a pistol grip"
                    Malthusianism is the idea that population growth is potentially exponential while the growth of the food supply is arithmetical at best.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Eagle Armory
                      Veteran Member
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 3340

                      Originally posted by THEDUELLIST
                      Good afternoon. I am a new member here. I have a question for the FFL's out there.

                      There is a particular Beretta PX4 Storm 9mm type F that I really want to buy. According to the DOJ list it is described as :

                      PX4 Storm Type F / Steel, Polymer Pistol 4" 9mm 12/14/2010


                      Beretta now has an "Olive Drab" version of the same EXACT gun. As far as I "seem" to be concerned, there is no indication of either the model number or the actual color of this gun on the list. I think this is a big grey area that can be challenged.

                      The model I want is: JSPX001

                      If this model can be shipped from a store/owner with 10 round mags, then wouldn't this pistol be California legal?

                      Thank you all for your time

                      It would be a better system and simpler if they listed the actual MFG UPC or Model number(s), instead of the vague description they put out now. Though, I know they are not interested in making it easier on you guys out there.
                      Subscribe To Our Newsletter

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        kemasa
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Jun 2005
                        • 10706

                        Yes, the process could be better, but in reality the list should be vaporized. If a firearm is unsafe, the manufacturer will be sued out of existence. If it is unsafe, then the police should not be allowed to use it and should not be exempt from the list.

                        I did update my previous post to make it clearer, btw. Why do you think that ammo tax and the like are popular attacks? The CFLC letter is another example. If a person does not have a FFL, then they can ship all the firearms they want, but FFLs have to get the letter, making it more difficult and causing some FFLs to refuse to ship to CA, just like the anti-gun people want.
                        Kemasa.
                        False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.

                        Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.

                        Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          THEDUELLIST
                          Junior Member
                          • May 2010
                          • 13

                          Originally posted by Eagle Armory
                          It would be a better system and simpler if they listed the actual MFG UPC or Model number(s), instead of the vague description they put out now. Though, I know they are not interested in making it easier on you guys out there.
                          I would almost hope they wouldn't list the actual mfg. model number. Reason being, I would think that would be a gray area that can be manipulated/exploited (by the buyer).

                          Example: It does not state on the list that it is a "Black" polymer gun. It only states polymer. So my thing is that as long as it does not specify the color of the polymer, then it should not make a difference if it is Olive Drab in color. Furthermore, no mfg. model number is indicated on the list............ Therefor (even though Beretta does have different model numbers for the black and olive drab) it should make no difference what the color is........ It's the same freekin gun!

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            kemasa
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Jun 2005
                            • 10706

                            That is fine for the buyer, but not so good for the FFL.

                            If the list was what it should be to ensure that only firearms are transferred which are on the list, then the make, model and serial number range would be listed, as well as the UPC code and other information. Remember, not all firearms are transferred with the original box/cases, so the firearm has to have enough information on it in order to determine if it is on the list.

                            But, the reality is that the list is just pure harassment and needs to go away. In the meantime, the police should be limited to the exact models on the list.
                            Kemasa.
                            False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.

                            Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.

                            Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Eagle Armory
                              Veteran Member
                              • Jul 2010
                              • 3340

                              Originally posted by kemasa
                              That is fine for the buyer, but not so good for the FFL.

                              If the list was what it should be to ensure that only firearms are transferred which are on the list, then the make, model and serial number range would be listed, as well as the UPC code and other information. Remember, not all firearms are transferred with the original box/cases, so the firearm has to have enough information on it in order to determine if it is on the list.

                              But, the reality is that the list is just pure harassment and needs to go away. In the meantime, the police should be limited to the exact models on the list.
                              My thoughts exactly.
                              Subscribe To Our Newsletter

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1