Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Muzzle device attachment for rimfire rifle to meet OAL?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • EBR Works
    Vendor/Retailer
    • Dec 2007
    • 10492

    Muzzle device attachment for rimfire rifle to meet OAL?

    What is the current requirement for muzzle attachment for meeting CA non-SBR status for a rimfire
    Last edited by EBR Works; 02-19-2019, 11:05 AM.


    Check out our e-commerce site here:

    www.ebrworks.com

    Serving you from Prescott, AZ
  • #2
    RoundEye
    CGSSA Director
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Mar 2010
    • 3671

    Originally posted by EBR Works
    What is the current requirement for muzzle attachment for meeting CA non-SBR status for a rimfire
    I'm not an 07, but I wouldn't believe so.

    My interpretation is that if the barrel is over 16", then the barrel is fine. If you need to make OAL, you just need to add a longer stock, or longer muzzle device to make length. If they required a muzzle device to be permanently attached to an otherwise compliant barrel, I would think the same for a stock would be required. However, the CADOJ doesn't always make sense either.
    Chad C.
    Certified GLOCK Armorer
    NRA Certified Pistol Instructor, & RSO
    CA DOJ Firearm Safety Instructor


    My YouTube Channel

    Subscribe to my blog
    Check Out My Editorials At Guns.com

    Stand And Fight, Join the NRA!

    Comment

    • #3
      audiophil2
      Senior Member
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Jan 2007
      • 8736

      Anything on the muzzle end needs to copy NFA guidelines as Ca took that part of the law from the NFA. Pin and weld or silver solder.

      Anything on the stock end only needs to not be easily removable/defeatable.

      It is much easier to modify the stock on the cmr30 to not close under 26" than to pin/weld some nose heavy extension.
      sigpic


      Private 10 acre range rentals
      [/URL]

      Comment

      • #4
        RoundEye
        CGSSA Director
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Mar 2010
        • 3671

        Originally posted by audiophil2
        Anything on the muzzle end needs to copy NFA guidelines as Ca took that part of the law from the NFA. Pin and weld or silver solder.
        Isn't that only for a barrel to make length (less than 16")?

        Chad C.
        Certified GLOCK Armorer
        NRA Certified Pistol Instructor, & RSO
        CA DOJ Firearm Safety Instructor


        My YouTube Channel

        Subscribe to my blog
        Check Out My Editorials At Guns.com

        Stand And Fight, Join the NRA!

        Comment

        • #5
          BONECUTTER
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2007
          • 2263

          The AW Regs said:
          (x) "Overall length of less than 30 inches" with respect to a centerfire rifle means the rifle has been measured in the shortest possible configuration that the weapon will' function/fire and the measurement is less than 30 inches Folding and telescoping stocks shall be collapsed prior to measurement The approved method for measuring the length of the
          rifle is to measure the firearm from the end of the barrel or permanently attached muzzle device if so equipped to thwart of the stock that is furthest from the end of the barrel, or permanently attached muzzle device (Prior to taking a measurement the owner must also check and muzzle devices for how thev are attached to the barrel.)
          No such requirement for permanence for rimfire rifles

          Comment

          • #6
            audiophil2
            Senior Member
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Jan 2007
            • 8736

            Originally posted by RoundEye
            Isn't that only for a barrel to make length (less than 16")?



            https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...ctionNum=17170
            That applies to NFA but the recent CA law copied the NFA style modification to get rifles out to 30.1".

            Originally posted by BONECUTTER
            The AW Regs said:


            No such requirement for permanence for rimfire rifles
            While not required most CA FFLs do not understand the difference. Modifying a stock for $1 in parts is far less costly than a. wasting time trying to convince a CA FFL a screw on extension is fine or b. pin/welding an extension to get a CA FFL to accept the transfer after he kicks it back claiming a screw on extension is illegal. The pin/weld is a de facto law I have zero interest in debating.

            After 2017 there are so many interpretations of CA law I no longer assume anything and just tell my clients to get confirmation their FFL will accept the gun the way they want it shipped. Saves everyone involved a lot of time. The rimfire issue is a big time waster to the point I have told clients to buy elsewhere if they want to debate me because I lose money arguing with them or shipping a compliant gun and then getting it sent back because the FFL changed his mind. I have shipped a lot of those cmr30's to CA and it has always been an easy process when they are converted my way.


            If EBR or any other middleman likes aggravation then he is welcome to swim upstream. I was just trying to make his life easier.
            sigpic


            Private 10 acre range rentals
            [/URL]

            Comment

            • #7
              BONECUTTER
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2007
              • 2263

              Originally posted by audiophil2


              While not required most CA FFLs do not understand the difference..
              I was just trying to make his life easier.
              I get that but your post was mislead by saying:
              Anything on the muzzle end needs to copy NFA guidelines as Ca took that part of the law from the NFA. Pin and weld or silver solder.
              and not

              Anything on the muzzle end should copy NFA guidelines for idiot FFL's who can't read simple english.

              Comment

              • #8
                RoundEye
                CGSSA Director
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Mar 2010
                • 3671

                Do either of you have a link to these NFA Guidelines, and the corresponding Guidelines for California that require a barrel > 16" to have a permanently attached muzzle device to make the OAL calculation > 26"?
                Chad C.
                Certified GLOCK Armorer
                NRA Certified Pistol Instructor, & RSO
                CA DOJ Firearm Safety Instructor


                My YouTube Channel

                Subscribe to my blog
                Check Out My Editorials At Guns.com

                Stand And Fight, Join the NRA!

                Comment

                • #9
                  EBR Works
                  Vendor/Retailer
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 10492

                  After some searching, I found this:

                  This is an understandably common question since the length of a firearm’s barrel and the overall length (OAL) of a firearm both factor into the determination of whether said firearm is regulated under the National Firearms Act (NFA). The ATF … Continue reading →


                  From this, one could reasonably infer that CA would require permanent attachment since the Feds appear to do so and CA never applies a lower standard.

                  Thanks to all that responded.
                  Last edited by EBR Works; 02-20-2019, 9:10 AM.


                  Check out our e-commerce site here:

                  www.ebrworks.com

                  Serving you from Prescott, AZ

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1