C&R + COE, 4473.

[shootsocal_dave]

I dont think it is required, but do you have a C&R/COE guy execute a 4473? I always have for continuity reasons, having the packets the same.

Any Pros/Cons other than have more paperwork?

[superhondaz50]

It's not required, but most still make the 03 fill one out though for whatever reason. IMHO, more paperwork equals more chances for the .gov to ding you.

[kemasa]

Not required and as said, it is something that if there is a mistake you could get written up for.

I was told by a person I trust at the BATF to not have them fill it out. I follow that advice.

There really isn't any pro to having them fill it out, just con.

[shootsocal_dave]

Thats what Im thinking. Just a big change.

[kemasa]

Thats what Im thinking. Just a big change.

It is hard to do as all of the usual stuff isn't done, but it is best thing to do only that which is required.

[shootsocal_dave]

Thats the stance I have been taking latley. Changing SOP little by little.

[ugimports]

The lack of 4473 only applies to C&R firearms, correct? Since the FFL03 isn't valid for modern firearms (in regards to ATF logging purposes).

I had a guy come in with his C&R/COE for multi handgun purchase and I still made him do 4473.

[kemasa]

The lack of 4473 only applies to C&R firearms, correct? Since the FFL03 isn't valid for modern firearms (in regards to ATF logging purposes).

I had a guy come in with his C&R/COE for multi handgun purchase and I still made him do 4473.

Yes, only for C&R firearms. If they also bought a modern gun, they would have to fill out a 4473, but you wouldn't need to put the C&R on the 4473 and any C&Rs wouldn't count for multiple firearms as they are considered licensed only for C&Rs.