Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Valid exemptions from the FSC

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ASD1
    1/2 BANNED
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Apr 2012
    • 1793

    Valid exemptions from the FSC

    Would an out of state CCW be a legal exemption from the FSC? One of us in the store has an opinion that the out of state CCW may not be considered valid in the state (which it isn't for carry) but also not a legal exemption for the FSC.

    Opinions?
    sigpic
  • #2
    tleeocinca
    Banned
    • Jan 2011
    • 893

    I'm pretty sure that an out of state CCW has the same value as toilet paper here in CA

    Comment

    • #3
      allpoint
      Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 209

      Which exemption would you use?
      Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) Permit Holder
      Exemption Code: X41; Authorized by Penal Code section 31700, subdivision (a)(9)
      Any individual who has a valid concealed weapons permit issued pursuant to Chapter 4
      (commencing with Penal Code section 26150).
      This list CA penal code not any other state.
      No Right to Police Protection

      Comment

      • #4
        acespawnshop
        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
        CGN Contributor
        • Jun 2012
        • 2852

        From the FSC Manual which references PC 31700, subdivision (a)(9):
        CCW Permit Holder
        Exemption Code X41-Any individual who has a valid concealed weapons permit issued pursuant to Chapter 4 9commencing with Penal Code section 26150)
        It is my opinion that 26150 references the requirements for CA issued CCWs
        Interstate Transfers $100 (DROS included with the price)
        Email acesjewelryandloan@hotmail.com if you need us to do a transfer!
        Or call 626-968-5900

        Follow us on Facebook @acesjewelryandloan Need Cash Fast? Get a loan on your firearms here!

        Comment

        • #5
          ASD1
          1/2 BANNED
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Apr 2012
          • 1793

          Thanks guys. My partner was correct.
          sigpic

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1