Tweet
I have read thru several posts or attempted to search, so please forgive this question if its very redundant. I cant seem to make heads or tails of the PC legalize.
Scenario: You locate a used firearm on Gunbroker. It is not currently on Roster (lets say a Gen 4 Glock). As a non-licensee . non LEO, are there any qualifiers where a CA resident can legally DROS if shipped to a CA FFL from an out of state owner (private party) or shop (FFL)
If I interpret it correctly, the seller being a private party is moot on interstate as their lack of a CDL removes its from the PPT transfer exception.
Does it being used factor at all? I noted one reference to it not being allowed if this transaction was the first transfer but not clear if it being used would make this a second transfer.
The apparent exception for a non-roster gun being on consignment seems to contradict the thinking that used is no different than new. Its it non roster its non roster, so wether its an outright sale and the CA is doing paperwork versus they put it on book first (or what ever consignment means legally) is effectively the same. That being they provided a CA resident a non-roster gun. To a lay person, consignment means its just technically owned by some else and effectively used. So what is the distinction if I understood correctly that consigned items are roster exempt?
Any difference is the seller is an out-of-state FFL?
Also it appears interstate transfer automatically means the 1 handgun per 30 day rule applies versus the PPT exemption.
Appreciate any clarification and patience in answering.
Scenario: You locate a used firearm on Gunbroker. It is not currently on Roster (lets say a Gen 4 Glock). As a non-licensee . non LEO, are there any qualifiers where a CA resident can legally DROS if shipped to a CA FFL from an out of state owner (private party) or shop (FFL)
If I interpret it correctly, the seller being a private party is moot on interstate as their lack of a CDL removes its from the PPT transfer exception.
Does it being used factor at all? I noted one reference to it not being allowed if this transaction was the first transfer but not clear if it being used would make this a second transfer.
The apparent exception for a non-roster gun being on consignment seems to contradict the thinking that used is no different than new. Its it non roster its non roster, so wether its an outright sale and the CA is doing paperwork versus they put it on book first (or what ever consignment means legally) is effectively the same. That being they provided a CA resident a non-roster gun. To a lay person, consignment means its just technically owned by some else and effectively used. So what is the distinction if I understood correctly that consigned items are roster exempt?
Any difference is the seller is an out-of-state FFL?
Also it appears interstate transfer automatically means the 1 handgun per 30 day rule applies versus the PPT exemption.
Appreciate any clarification and patience in answering.
Comment