One of the things I've seen in support of SB 53 is that it will give law enforcement more investigative tools since all transactions for ammunition will be tracked. Having never been in law enforcement, I have to rely on my simple Marine mind to figure this out, but would having ammunition sales records really help you solve crimes?
Two scenarios - if I were a criminal (note to NSA - this is hypothetical, I'm not a criminal) I would not purchase ammunition online or with a credit card to eliminate any transaction record. I wouldn't use a gun that was registered to me and I would remove any identifiable marks on the gun. I certainly wouldn't apply for an ammunition purchase permit. So I gain access to ammo and I use it in a crime - where does SB 53 help you guys?
If, as a normally law-abiding citizen I happened to commit a crime with a gun, I most likely have used my own firearm, more than likely properly registered, with ammunition I purchased with a traceable financial transaction. In this case, it seems like you would have enough information based on our current laws to use in an investigation.
Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance.
Two scenarios - if I were a criminal (note to NSA - this is hypothetical, I'm not a criminal) I would not purchase ammunition online or with a credit card to eliminate any transaction record. I wouldn't use a gun that was registered to me and I would remove any identifiable marks on the gun. I certainly wouldn't apply for an ammunition purchase permit. So I gain access to ammo and I use it in a crime - where does SB 53 help you guys?
If, as a normally law-abiding citizen I happened to commit a crime with a gun, I most likely have used my own firearm, more than likely properly registered, with ammunition I purchased with a traceable financial transaction. In this case, it seems like you would have enough information based on our current laws to use in an investigation.
Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance.

Comment