I have a question about Taser use and thought I'd get an answer straight from the folks who use them most:
I am familiar with the fact that using a firearm on someone without going to prison afterwards requires you to be in legitimate fear for yours or someone else's life or to defend the same against a reasonably perceived threat of great bodily harm and that this is the standard set by law no matter if you are LEO or a regular Joe.
What if anything from above differs in the use of a Taser against a person other than the fact the person you shoot with it will be alive to sue you afterwards?
I am familiar with the fact that using a firearm on someone without going to prison afterwards requires you to be in legitimate fear for yours or someone else's life or to defend the same against a reasonably perceived threat of great bodily harm and that this is the standard set by law no matter if you are LEO or a regular Joe.
What if anything from above differs in the use of a Taser against a person other than the fact the person you shoot with it will be alive to sue you afterwards?

Comment