anyone seen this yet?

[Falconis]

Seems to be some misinformation in this thing.

http://digital.911media.com/i/80538/20

[NuGunner]

So when it refers to high cap magazines, we're subject to the civilian restrictions in that state we are visiting? I don't get it.

[Notorious]

It says LEOSA is silent on the matter. Many have presumed that as the magazine is a functional component of the firearm, it is subsumed in the exemptions, but I wouldn't make that jump simply because a semi can work as well with a limited cap as well as full cap.

Personally, I don't plan on going to many states where firearms laws are crazier than CA so whatever. As for CA, all my magazines are legally obtained and possessed, so I have no worries here.

[Spanky8601]

It says LEOSA is silent on the matter. Many have presumed that as the magazine is a functional component of the firearm, it is subsumed in the exemptions, but I wouldn't make that jump simply because a semi can work as well with a limited cap as well as full cap.

Personally, I don't plan on going to many states where firearms laws are crazier than CA so whatever. As for CA, all my magazines are legally obtained and possessed, so I have no worries here.

If you travel to New Jersey be sure to only have the limited capacity mags.

[Notorious]

If you travel to New Jersey be sure to only have the limited capacity mags.

and EFMJ bullets just in case

[chsk9]

Doesn't LEOSA supersede NJ (or any other) State law?

This article posted on the FBI web site states is does with the exception of trespassing(?).

http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/january2011/off_duty_firearms

I realize that most people do not wish to be the test case on the limitations!