Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

HR218 and alcohol

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CalCop
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 573

    HR218 and alcohol

    Not saying it's a good idea to drink and carry a gun.....but......

    I know LEOSA says to be covered under its provisions you cannot be under the influence of alcohol. However, if you are a CA LEO inside CA, you do not need LEOSA to exempt you from the anti-CCW laws. You are exempted by CA PC 830 et seq, which has no prohibition on alcohol consumption while carrying off-duty.

    Does anyone interpret LEOSA to have added new requirements that even when a CA cop is in CA, if he is drinking, he has VIOLATED LEOSA?

    You can't really violate LEOSA, right? You can just lose its protections (while out of state) if you drink....?

    Has LEOSA affected CA cops in ANY way while they are in CA?
    Last edited by CalCop; 03-22-2012, 7:27 PM.
    "Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen."
    -- Sir Robert Peel
  • #2
    mej16489
    Veteran Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2714

    Originally posted by CalCop
    You can't really violate LEOSA, right? You can just lose its protections (while out of state)
    This.

    Comment

    • #3
      swat
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 643

      Alcohol and Guns don't mix to well!

      Comment

      • #4
        cacop
        Member
        • Jan 2006
        • 310

        It doesn't matter to me since my department says booze and guns together are a violation of policy.

        LEOSA is better understood as what you can do outside your home state.

        Comment

        • #5
          hitman13
          Veteran Member
          • Sep 2007
          • 3793

          Originally posted by swat
          Alcohol and Guns don't mix to well!
          I disagree, excessive alcohol and guns don't mix though....

          Comment

          • #6
            biochembruin
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2006
            • 822

            Originally posted by swat
            Alcohol and Guns don't mix to well!
            Like I always say, the day I can't do my job drunk is the day I turn in my badge and gun!



            (to state the obvious, it's a joke)
            The thing to do, my friends, is to admit to your fate with Christian resignation and live bravely until your appointed time." - Lee Marvin, "The Spikes Gang"

            Comment

            • #7
              cacop
              Member
              • Jan 2006
              • 310

              Originally posted by biochembruin
              Like I always say, the day I can't do my job drunk is the day I turn in my badge and gun!



              (to state the obvious, it's a joke)
              I heard up until maybe 10-12 years ago SFPD could have two beers with lunch.

              Dayshift would be a lot less stessful if I could crack open a beer around 1400 or so.

              Comment

              • #8
                Eirerogue
                Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 495

                I'll have enough on my plate if I have to use my firearm. I don't need any problems with booze and questions about was I, or wasn't I under the influence.

                Comment

                • #9
                  swat
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 643

                  Originally posted by hitman13
                  I disagree, excessive alcohol and guns don't mix though....
                  What do you consider "excessive" alcohol? Does the person who is consuming alcohol have the ability to determine when they have crossed the line into "excessive" consumption? What happens to you if you have to shoot someone after you have had a few drinks of alcohol? Doesn't alcohol impair your judgement, even less than "excessive" consumption? Would evidence of impairment be used against you?

                  Just a few things to think of before you go out to consume and carry.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Che762x39
                    Veteran Member
                    • Aug 2011
                    • 4538

                    Originally posted by hitman13
                    I disagree, excessive alcohol and guns don't mix though....

                    F.Y.I.

                    Alcohol + guns = unemployed cop working construction.

                    After 25+ years on the job I can tell you 187 incidents regarding a moment of "stupid" screwing up somebodies life.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      BigDogatPlay
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 7362

                      Originally posted by Che762x39
                      Alcohol + guns = unemployed cop working construction.
                      +1

                      It's the bad decision making that alcohol drives that always gets guys in trouble. If I was toasty in a public place off duty the last thing I'd be worrying about is LEOSA. I'd be worried about the bosses finding out I was toasty in a public place off duty and making my life a living hell for a while.
                      -- Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun

                      Not a lawyer, just a former LEO proud to have served.

                      Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. -- James Madison

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Bobby Ricigliano
                        Mit Gott und Mauser
                        CGN Contributor
                        • Feb 2011
                        • 17439

                        I wouldn't mix the two, whether permitted or not. The presence of alcohol would be a tasty morsel for a D.A. or civil claimant attorney to stick their teeth into as far as questioning your judgement at the time of the incident.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          CalCop
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 573

                          Like I said in my original post....it's not a good idea. However, can anyone shed light on my original question via some kind of legal documentation.
                          "Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen."
                          -- Sir Robert Peel

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            ckim34
                            Member
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 408

                            It's a bad idea to mix the two and I'm sure most departments have a policy that states you cant be drinking and have your gun. Unless you are at home I guess.....

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              CalCop
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 573

                              Originally posted by ckim34
                              It's a bad idea to mix the two and I'm sure most departments have a policy that states you cant be drinking and have your gun. Unless you are at home I guess.....
                              The department I am concerned with does not have a policy against it. Could they use LEOSA to try and say the cop "violated" LEOSA? In my reading, LEOSA is an exemption to prosecution, not something you can violate. I was just hoping maybe an attorney here could confirm my suspicions.
                              "Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen."
                              -- Sir Robert Peel

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1