Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

CA Legal AR on duty?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • center_x
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 999

    CA Legal AR on duty?

    What do guys think about using a CA legal AR on duty?

    What are the pros/cons of using one?

    If I were to use one, what "device" would you recommend? (Ex.BB, mag lock, ect.)
    "In a society, it is the responsibility of the few strong to protect the many weak"

    "Knowledge is a sheild against the unexpected and a solution to the unknown"
  • #2
    G-RAT!
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 161

    if you are LEO while on duty the BB law doesnt apply to you

    Comment

    • #3
      biochembruin
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2006
      • 822

      I would recommend against it. Clearing malfunctions would be problematic with a magazine lock. Magazine changes under stress would be a challenge also, especially tactical reloads. If you're trying to get your department to allow you to use a California legal AR, you might as well go the extra mile and try to get an assault weapon letter.
      The thing to do, my friends, is to admit to your fate with Christian resignation and live bravely until your appointed time." - Lee Marvin, "The Spikes Gang"

      Comment

      • #4
        SByota
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2009
        • 513

        Bad idea!!! I agree with the above. Get your brass to authorize you to purchase a RAW and carry that. If you are a LEO PM me you "offical" email and I will give you the details of how I did this exact thing at my department. My Colt 6940 rides with me on patrol every shift.

        Comment

        • #5
          tyrist
          Veteran Member
          • Jun 2007
          • 4564

          NO pros

          Tons of cons including basic loading/unloading, malfunction clearance, speed reloading, tactical reloading, and suppressive fire.

          Using a mini 14 would be a better idea.
          Last edited by tyrist; 06-04-2011, 5:08 PM.

          Comment

          • #6
            18sam2011
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2009
            • 777

            If you're having to use a CA legal AR for duty use I am guessing that your department does not issue rifles nor do they give letters.

            If that's the case, I highly doubt that your department would authorize you to use a rifle on duty either. Remember, just because it's legal to carry, doesn't mean it is in accordance with YOUR department policy.

            Always stay within policy when it comes to weaponry used in the performance of your duty. It's not worth losing your job.

            Comment

            • #7
              center_x
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2010
              • 999

              Thanks all for your reply. The reason why I ask is because im a Level 1 reserve with a county department. I don't want to go to brass until im hired FT.

              Yet again, thank you for everyones time.
              Last edited by center_x; 06-04-2011, 5:58 PM.
              "In a society, it is the responsibility of the few strong to protect the many weak"

              "Knowledge is a sheild against the unexpected and a solution to the unknown"

              Comment

              • #8
                biochembruin
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2006
                • 822

                I wouldn't imagine your command staff would allow you to use a California legal AR on duty regardless of your reserve or full time status. However, if they have a liberal shotgun policy, you may want to look into your policy regarding slug ammunition. At typical patrol distances, slugs have some distinct benefits, not the least of which is the ability to penetrate more intermediate barriers than an AR would, such as windshields.
                The thing to do, my friends, is to admit to your fate with Christian resignation and live bravely until your appointed time." - Lee Marvin, "The Spikes Gang"

                Comment

                • #9
                  nobody33
                  Member
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 298

                  Yeah if your department won't give you one, or a letter, they are not going to let you carry one anyways. And if you get a letter you will have to buy a whole new rifle.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Triad
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 1684

                    Huge liability.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      1911su16b870
                      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                      CGN Contributor
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 7654

                      Whatever your department policy says! If your rifle is not in policy you are SOL if something goes down and wrong.
                      "Bruen, the Bruen opinion, I believe, discarded the intermediate scrutiny test that I also thought was not very useful; and has, instead, replaced it with a text history and tradition test." Judge Benitez 12-12-2022

                      NRA Endowment Life Member, CRPA Life Member
                      GLOCK (Gen 1-5, G42/43), Colt AR15/M16/M4, Sig P320, Sig P365, Beretta 90 series, Remington 870, HK UMP Factory Armorer
                      Remington Nylon, 1911, HK, Ruger, Hudson H9 Armorer, just for fun!
                      I instruct it if you shoot it.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Notorious
                        Veteran Member
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 4697

                        Originally posted by center_x
                        Thanks all for your reply. The reason why I ask is because im a Level 1 reserve with a county department. I don't want to go to brass until im hired FT.

                        Yet again, thank you for everyones time.
                        Wait... Does your department allow for privately owned patrol rifles or not? If they do, then there is a policy on how you go about getting the letter from the brass. It doesn't matter how new you are as long as it is authorized and you follow the protocol in getting the letter signed off.

                        Now if reserves aren't allowed private rifles, then what are you doing anyway?

                        If reserves are allowed private rifles but they won't authorize a letter for you, then I would recommend something that is legal and can take detachable mags like the Mini-14 which is in use by the biggest County in CA. 2,300 deputies can't be wrong, can they?

                        I would not use a BB AR as a fighting gun unless it is the only only only functioning gun in the vicinity and only until I find a real AR.
                        I like guns

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          BigDogatPlay
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Jun 2007
                          • 7362

                          A mag locked rifle has no place in law enforcement use for all the reasons cited above. If you can use a privately owned rifle, but aren't blessed with the letter to be able to buy a featured gun, I'd also suggest a Mini-14 as Notorious mentions.

                          Utterly reliable and even with ten round mags it would be far superior to any mag locked gun.
                          -- Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun

                          Not a lawyer, just a former LEO proud to have served.

                          Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. -- James Madison

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            center_x
                            Senior Member
                            • Jan 2010
                            • 999

                            Ive been told as long as I can pass qualification, id be able to use my CA Legal AR, but like everyone here, I was unsure about using a BB in the field.

                            I like the Mini's, they are great guns, but I didnt want to fork out more $$$ for another gun. I guess I cant have too many toys

                            Thanks all for your inputs.
                            "In a society, it is the responsibility of the few strong to protect the many weak"

                            "Knowledge is a sheild against the unexpected and a solution to the unknown"

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              1911su16b870
                              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                              CGN Contributor
                              • Dec 2006
                              • 7654

                              Fighting Rifle = Detachable Magazine. You have many 223/556 options here in CA.

                              SU16, Benelli MR1, featureless AR, Saiga, featureless AK, Mini 14.

                              The SU and MR1 even take AR magazines.
                              "Bruen, the Bruen opinion, I believe, discarded the intermediate scrutiny test that I also thought was not very useful; and has, instead, replaced it with a text history and tradition test." Judge Benitez 12-12-2022

                              NRA Endowment Life Member, CRPA Life Member
                              GLOCK (Gen 1-5, G42/43), Colt AR15/M16/M4, Sig P320, Sig P365, Beretta 90 series, Remington 870, HK UMP Factory Armorer
                              Remington Nylon, 1911, HK, Ruger, Hudson H9 Armorer, just for fun!
                              I instruct it if you shoot it.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1