Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

LEOSA Improvement act HELP NEEDED

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jared1981
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 278

    LEOSA Improvement act HELP NEEDED

    The U.S. Senate passed S. 1132 and the house companion bill H 3752 is awaiting action.

    The bill does the following:

    •Clarify the status of Amtrak Police and other federal officers
    •Grant LEOSA carry rights to current and retired law enforcement officers (with civilian arrest powers) who work or have worked for a branch of the United States Armed Forces.
    •Reduce the amount of time that an officer has to serve as an officer from 15 years to 10 years to qualify for LEOSA carry rights
    •Create a procedure for retired officers to meet the requirements necessary for LEOSA carry

    It also exempts LESOA folks from the federal gun free schools act. It also allows people to qualify with any department in the state instead of insisting on a state standard. CA, MT, WY, MO, LA, NY, MT, AK and WI do not have a state standard so retired LEO's in these states will not be able to qualify with any PD in the state.

    NOTE: THE BIGGEST THING

    It federally preempts ammo restrictions so places like New Jersey can no longer ban LEOSA people from carrying hollowpoint ammo.

    The bill is missing one thing and I need your help on that. The bill does not address magazine limits. CA as well as NY, HI, MA, and NJ have magazine restrictions. I contacted Congressman Forbes (R-VA) office as he is the sponsor of the house bill. His staff was very interested in what I had to say about the magazine issue.

    PLEASE contact his office and express that you would like to see an amendment to his bill to exempt "magazines and other feeding devices that are not prohibited by federal law".

    PLEASE call him at 202-225-6365

    This bill will probably pass the house and become law as it has overwhelming support and it is very possible to get the magazine preemption inserted into the bill. All it takes is a 2 minute phone call to his office.

    Please do this. It appears the lack of magazine preemption was an oversight, please call and insist on an amendment to fix this. The Senate should concur with the amendment since S 1132 passed the senate with no issues and no votes against it.

    Naturally, I would like to see all restrictions on the RKBA removed; however, in the immediate present time, we can at least make a huge improvement for LEO's. LEO's have been threatened to be jammed up in NJ for magazines that hold over 15 rounds and hollowpoints.
    Last edited by retired; 06-07-2010, 10:53 AM. Reason: corrected last number of prefix
  • #2
    retired
    Administrator
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Sep 2007
    • 9409

    I called his office and spoke with a lady there. She transferred me to a gentleman and I left a voice mail. She wanted me to speak with this supervisor even after I explained what I was requesting. So, I am waiting for his return call.
    Last edited by retired; 06-07-2010, 11:05 AM.

    Comment

    • #3
      Jared1981
      Member
      • May 2009
      • 278

      Originally posted by retired
      I called his office and spoke with a lady there. She transferred me to a gentleman and I left a voice mail. She wanted me to speak with this supervisor even after I explained what I was requesting. So, I am waiting for his return call.
      Thank you for doing this.

      Usually when you call an office they act polite and say thank you and you get a generic letter in the mail.

      When I called, the man I spoke with sounded very serious and I think they really overlooked this and they will fix it if enough people call. They asked for my number and he asked if it was ok if they called me back if they had more questions.

      If you are a member of any police forum or FOP or whatever, please post my message there as well.

      Thank you very much for calling and I hope more people do the same. It's not a long shot, I think they just forgot.

      I gave the example that most agencies issue standard capacity magazines and if they were to vacation in Hawaii, New Jersey, they just committed a felony.

      The same may be able to be said about California.

      Comment

      • #4
        Retriever Believer
        Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 107

        Jared,

        Thanks for your work on this. I will call Congressman Forbes' office in the morning.

        I think you have a typo in your post in that you state: "CA, MT, WY, MO, LA, NY, MT, AK and WI do not have a state standard so retired LEO's in these states will not be able to qualify with any PD in the state". Under this cleanup legislation won't retired officers in these states be able to qualify with any PD in the state?

        This legislation is very important to retired peace officers.
        Last edited by Retriever Believer; 06-22-2010, 6:50 PM.

        Comment

        • #5
          Jared1981
          Member
          • May 2009
          • 278

          Believer,

          sorry if I was confusing, the bill would allow you to qualify with any PD in your state of residence if there is no state standard.

          If you do call please ask that they also add magazines and feeding devices to the definition of firearms as they did with ammo. This would solve high cap mag issues (at least for LEOSA folks).

          Comment

          • #6
            retired
            Administrator
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Sep 2007
            • 9409

            I didn't realize how fortunate I am after reading Retriever Believer. I just have to call the range, make an appt. and come down to shoot. IIRC, I pay for the ammo they provide (lead free), shoot and I'm done until the next year. Same thing for the county one that is good for 5yrs.

            I have both, because as I said above, I tend to forget about the LEOSA one and I forget to renew it.

            Comment

            • #7
              socalblue
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 811

              Are there any differences between the House & Senate versions? AS the bill passed the Senate by unanimous consent it's not likely there would be a need for a conference committee. Better to get the changes in the House bill before it goes to the floor for a vote.

              Comment

              • #8
                Jared1981
                Member
                • May 2009
                • 278

                Socalblue, I am not aware of any differences but that is why it is urgent to change the house version via amendment before it is passed and heard by the full house. I see no reason why the senate would not go along with the magazine amendment, please call Rep. Forbes' office tomorrow and insist that magazines and feeding devices be included in the definition of firearms as they did with ammo. The magazine issue is very important and it will be reality if LEO's start calling. Please tell your LEO buddies to call, it takes 2 minutes.

                Comment

                • #9
                  alex00
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 839

                  I made the call. Thanks for posting this Jared.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    7x57
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 5182

                    Just make sure they word it right so "importing" and such are all covered. If they overlooked it, they might not know enough to avoid botching it if they amend in a hurry.

                    7x57
                    sigpic

                    What do you need guns for if you are going to send your children, seven hours a day, 180 days a year to government schools? What do you need the guns for at that point?-- R. C. Sproul, Jr. (unconfirmed)

                    Originally posted by bulgron
                    I know every chance I get I'm going to accuse 7x57 of being a shill for LCAV. Because I can.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Old Deputy
                      Junior Member
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 40

                      I saw this posted on officer.com http://forums.officer.com/forums/sho...vement-of-2009 There didn't seem to be a lot of interest, which is too bad.
                      'Sheriff, I see you have your pistol. Are you expecting trouble?' 'No ma'am. If I were expecting trouble, I would have also brought my rifle and shotgun.'

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Steyrlp10
                        C3 Leader
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 5341

                        To the OP: thanks for sharing this. I'm passing it onto my better half. He's a retired LEO like many of the Calgunners on here. I'll ask him to distribute to his non-Calguns buds too.
                        sigpic

                        If you live in Solano County, please join us at:
                        http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/group.php?groupid=12


                        NRA Certified Pistol Instructor

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          CaptMike
                          Senior Member
                          • Jun 2006
                          • 1272

                          Just called and they were very nice and wanted as much info as possible. Thanks for getting us on this. stay safe everyone
                          A life is not important, except for the impact it has on other lives- Jackie Robinson

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            jdberger
                            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                            CGN Contributor
                            • Oct 2005
                            • 8944

                            I'd be happy to make the call - y'all don't mind if some non-LEOs get involved, do you?
                            Rest in Peace - Andrew Breitbart. A true student of Alinsky.

                            90% of winning is simply showing up.

                            "Let's not lose sight of how much we reduced our carbon footprint by telecommuting this protest." 383green

                            sigpic
                            NRA Benefactor Member

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              obeygiant
                              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                              CGN Contributor
                              • Oct 2007
                              • 4168

                              Will call tomorrow, thank you for posting this up.
                              sigpic
                              Member, CRPA Board of Directors
                              "No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little." - Edmund Burke

                              Search Calguns using Google
                              CGN Search plugin for Firefox & IE CA Shotgun AW ID Flowchart CA Handgun AW ID Flowchart CA Senate CA Assembly Anti-2A Search Plugin

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1