Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Routine Traffic Stop

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrClamperSir
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    • Feb 2009
    • 2570

    Routine Traffic Stop

    During a traffic stop can a LEO tell if someone owns guns (because they are registered with the DOJ) or has a CCW? Does this info come up through DL or vehicle information? I would appreciate any LE weighing in but particularity those who work in more CCW friendly counties as they'd be more likely to encounter someone with a permit.
    Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.

    Originally posted by dieselpower
    Its very rare LEO encounter some armed crazy who is going to kill them, but it happens enough to warrant their training....... And its rare to encounter LEO willing to lie, cheat and falsify testimony, but it happens enough to warrant invoking all your rights the second you are stopped.
  • #2
    tyrist
    Veteran Member
    • Jun 2007
    • 4564

    This question is commonly asked and the answer is no. You have to run the information through a completely different data base and unless you are doing an active criminal investigation there is no reason to do the search.

    Comment

    • #3
      MrClamperSir
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
      • Feb 2009
      • 2570

      How do you find these posts? I ran through the search button a few different key words and nothing.
      Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.

      Originally posted by dieselpower
      Its very rare LEO encounter some armed crazy who is going to kill them, but it happens enough to warrant their training....... And its rare to encounter LEO willing to lie, cheat and falsify testimony, but it happens enough to warrant invoking all your rights the second you are stopped.

      Comment

      • #4
        DiscoBayJoe
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2008
        • 1320

        I run a scanner and I hear them say 'negative for weapons' when they are heading out to calls. They also pre-run the license plate when they are doing traffic stops (that's what he's doing back there before he approaches you).

        For me, I think the big NRA LIFE MEMBER on the back window of the jeep gives it away
        sigpic Find me on IRC chat at irc.dal.net in room #CGT

        Comment

        • #5
          MrClamperSir
          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
          • Feb 2009
          • 2570

          Originally posted by DiscoBayJoe
          I run a scanner and I hear them say 'negative for weapons' when they are heading out to calls. )
          Interesting. How is this explained by those that say the info isn't available to officers without running a different data base?
          Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.

          Originally posted by dieselpower
          Its very rare LEO encounter some armed crazy who is going to kill them, but it happens enough to warrant their training....... And its rare to encounter LEO willing to lie, cheat and falsify testimony, but it happens enough to warrant invoking all your rights the second you are stopped.

          Comment

          • #6
            Fjold
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Oct 2005
            • 22958

            Originally posted by MrClamperSir
            How do you find these posts? I ran through the search button a few different key words and nothing.

            To paraphrase Kes:

            Search sucks on this site. Someone should do something about it.
            Frank

            One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375




            Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

            Comment

            • #7
              ojisan
              Agent 86
              CGN Contributor
              • Apr 2008
              • 11765

              Guns are registered to addresses.
              From the address of the call, they check to see if any guns are registered there so the arriving officers know to be extra careful.

              Originally posted by Citadelgrad87
              I don't really care, I just like to argue.

              Comment

              • #8
                MrClamperSir
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                • Feb 2009
                • 2570

                Originally posted by ojisan
                Guns are registered to addresses.
                From the address of the call, they check to see if any guns are registered there so the arriving officers know to be extra careful.
                I see.
                Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.

                Originally posted by dieselpower
                Its very rare LEO encounter some armed crazy who is going to kill them, but it happens enough to warrant their training....... And its rare to encounter LEO willing to lie, cheat and falsify testimony, but it happens enough to warrant invoking all your rights the second you are stopped.

                Comment

                • #9
                  SoCalDep
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2007
                  • 815

                  Originally posted by ojisan
                  Guns are registered to addresses.
                  From the address of the call, they check to see if any guns are registered there so the arriving officers know to be extra careful.
                  Hmmm...I doubt it. It's not the way my agency does it, and it's not the way that the agency (possibly the same one??? ) that patrols your area does it.

                  The reason they say negative for weapons is that dispatchers often (to my massive frustration) say "no weapons" when they ask if the bad guy has any guns and the informant says "no". They should be saying "unknown if weapons" or "per inf, no weapons". I treat every call I go to like there is a gun.

                  I'm lucky if I can get them to type in the plate of a stolen vehicle so I can run it without my radio center asking for my status five times. I'm absolutely amazed if they put the full name of the informant, the phone number or (gasp!) the cross streets into the call. I don't know where you got your info on this, but I'm willing to bet it's false.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    red2sniper
                    Member
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 214

                    I don't know where you got your info on this, but I'm willing to bet it's false.[/QUOTE]

                    I am not even sure if we can run an address for guns. The only way my department knows about weapons is if we go on a call and the person has weapons and we tell them to "flag" the address as weapons being present. The only time we would do that is that if the person is borderline nuts and says something to make us think they would use them against us.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      eta34
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 2432

                      Originally posted by MrClamperSir
                      Interesting. How is this explained by those that say the info isn't available to officers without running a different data base?
                      When we go to a call, particularly a disturbance, assault, or domestic violence call, the dispatcher will ask the reporting party about the presence of weapons. This is where the info comes from. There is NO database that tells us this.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        monaghan
                        Junior Member
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 21

                        When you hear 'negative for weapons' I think this is with reference to probabtion?

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Ron-Solo
                          In Memoriam
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 8581

                          Originally posted by SoCalDep
                          Hmmm...I doubt it. It's not the way my agency does it, and it's not the way that the agency (possibly the same one??? ) that patrols your area does it.

                          The reason they say negative for weapons is that dispatchers often (to my massive frustration) say "no weapons" when they ask if the bad guy has any guns and the informant says "no". They should be saying "unknown if weapons" or "per inf, no weapons". I treat every call I go to like there is a gun.

                          I'm lucky if I can get them to type in the plate of a stolen vehicle so I can run it without my radio center asking for my status five times. I'm absolutely amazed if they put the full name of the informant, the phone number or (gasp!) the cross streets into the call. I don't know where you got your info on this, but I'm willing to bet it's false.

                          What he said
                          LASD Retired
                          1978-2011

                          NRA Life Member
                          CRPA Life Member
                          NRA Rifle Instructor
                          NRA Shotgun Instructor
                          NRA Range Safety Officer
                          DOJ Certified Instructor

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Spyder
                            CGN Contributor
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 17071

                            In my county, CCW shows up connected to vehicle registration. I was out shooting clay pigeons off of the levee one time (which is totally legal where I was at, and standard practice for the locals) and was approached by a SO after I parked in a restaurant parking lot. Apparently someone had called in my vehicle as someone that was shooting a fifty into the river. The SO came up and asked me if I had been shooting, I said yes, he asked if he could check the firearms, I said sure. On the radio, he ran my license plate and the return was my name, address, and that I am a current CCW holder.
                            Some places it is connected, though I was always under the belief that it wasn't supposed to be broadcast.
                            Guess I oughta do some research!

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            UA-8071174-1