Those “auditor” people who post videos online

[bigboarstopper]

I’ve watched numerous videos of those “auditor” people who open carry while fishing or take pictures of public government property in an effort to provoke a response from police. There are numerous other scenarios, typically it boils down to detention/detainment, trespassing on public property, and “legal” refusal to identify.

I find these videos interesting for many reasons. The law, the police response, the “auditors” demeanor, the list goes on.

My take, I’m fairly dumbfounded how many police officers take the bait. I’m sure there are way more interactions where the officer spots these people and simply ignores their antics and the interaction never gets posted online. But I am surprised how many seem completely ignorant about these people and take the bait.

Have you had interactions with these people? What was the circumstances? What’s your take on any of these videos/situations?

FYI, I have no interest in creating one of these scenarios myself.

[esy]

Yes.

Usually 1st amendment stuff where they try to get signatures and businesses don’t want them there or just plain recording me before, during, or after my call.

If it’s before or during the call, I just tell them they can record all they want, stay back, and we’re good (absent major safety concerns). After, I give them my name and badge if they want it and explain whatever needs to be explained.

The signature folk usually cite incorrect and old court decisions (a la Pruneyard) without knowing much behind it other than to utter “my first amendment right is protected by the Pruneyard case. You should look it up, sir.” Then, I get the luxury of correcting them that the correct court ruling is Van vs Home Depot. So, yay for that.

[caliprep]

I don't mind it. It is a first amendment right, we won't feed into their bs though.

[painkiller]