Tweet
Thanks for all the responses
-
-
Pay the extortion price like the rest of us -
Not buddy buddy with any current LEOs?Comment
-
If you build a man a fire, you'll keep him warm for the evening. If you set a man on fire, you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life.Comment
-
Move this to OT; would probably make an epic thread.Comment
-
Is your FFL able to receive it if it's from out of state?Comment
-
My understanding is that if an active LE buys a personal off roster firearm and decides he doesn't want to keep it for whatever reason, he is free to sell it as normal.Originally posted by 4473G19Comment
-
Nope. His conviction was for a single transaction involving a Glock that he purchased for his uncle under Glock's LE discount program.
It wasn't his father involved in this. It was his uncle.Originally posted by 4473G19
The Supreme Court decision contains no information suggesting his involvement in any other crimes. Is there some other source of information that leads you to believe hat he was "a corrupt cop being looked at for other felonies"?
If so, is your source of this information any better than the source that led you to believe it was his father being involved in the straw sale?If you build a man a fire, you'll keep him warm for the evening. If you set a man on fire, you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life.Comment
-
Thanks for the quick reply. Also my bad, the decision does show that he was arrested for bank robbery, and that led to the discovery of the sales receipt. The court doesn't tell us what happened to the bank robbery caper, but the context of events here suggest that they couldn't proceed on that case.Originally posted by 4473G19Forgive me.....I knew I should have looked up the case again, couldn't recall which "relative" it was! I recalled he was indicted for the robbery but apparently those charges were dropped. Excuse my characterization or mis-characterization of Abramski's character.
In June 2010, Abramski was arrested for suspicion of committing a bank robbery. During a search of his home, the police found a receipt showing that Abramski gave the handgun to his uncle in exchange for $400. The police charged Abramski with violating federal law by making a false, material statement on an ATF form and with respect to information kept by a licensed firearms dealer. Specifically, the government argued that Abramski knowingly made a false statement to a firearms dealer, that he intended to deceive the firearms dealer, and that he made the false statement about a "material fact" when he did not disclose that he was buying the firearm for his uncle. A grand jury subsequently indicted Abramski.If you build a man a fire, you'll keep him warm for the evening. If you set a man on fire, you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life.Comment
-
Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws."
-- Edward Abbey, "Abbey's Road", 1979Comment
-
Why would you retire in CA? If I'm not out by retirement I plan to be out shortly after.Last edited by mossy; 01-09-2022, 7:59 PM.best troll thread in calguns history
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=406739
burn the circus down cuz the world is full of clownsComment
There are currently 18526 users online. 119 members and 18407 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 11:39 PM on 02-14-2026.
Comment