Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this revolver a former CDC issue?
Collapse
X
-
I don’t see any holster wear, and they were always marked from what I’ve seen.
Then again, it looks like a 64-3, and it looks like the trigger and hammer aren’t original. My 64-3’s trigger and hammer (it’s all original) look much different.Last edited by GizmoSD; 05-24-2019, 7:23 PM. -
I am not an expert on these, but you are correct. They had the model 10s that were blued and then the 64. Again, I dont know a lot, sorry. I only shot the Model 64.
Last edited by 111222; 05-24-2019, 11:08 PM.Comment
-
-
It's hard to tell from the picture but that grip looks a lot like the grip that is on the current production model 64 & 67 on Smith's web site.
Comment
-
I got my 64 from L C Action . It is not marked CDCR but was traided in from California Health Care Facility in Stockton. It has the 2 piece barrel and it is a dash 8 sn CJX.... CHCF opened in 2013 and was the last to purchase .38’s before the conversion to glock model 22’s.Comment
-
You didn't mention what year you were in the CDCR academy. The gun in the pic is no older than 2002. That was the 1st year, the internal key lock system was introduced with the model 64-7. So if you attended the academy pre 2002, you shot a different model 64 "pre lock" gun.
Plus....every CDCR issued revolver I ever saw, had CDC /CDCR markings. Same spot, on the frame, left side under the cylinder window.
Glocks 23's. 22's started showing up in 2008 with CDCR. OCS, EOU, CRT, ISU, TU.
IMHO I don't think it was a issued CDCR weapon.
Good Luck.Comment
-
If you read theses emails from LCAction, they clearly show that many CDC revolvers were traded in without markings. After this issue I contacted the Armory Sergeant at CHCF. He told me that none of the revolvers purchased for CHCF were marked CDC. Being that I knew him and his wife for years (she was the UOF coordinator) I tend to believe him. I will say that I never saw another institution without markings on their revolvers. I worked at 6 different ones.
I will say the grip on his revolver is not what mine came with.
Hello,
So the reporting department will be updating the system and showing that they had the wrong number. Your weapon should be released soon.
Please let me know if you need anything further.
Daniella Escobedo
LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY
1088 N FIRST STREET
SAN JOSE CA 95112
[PHONE] 408.294.2677 [FAX] 408.294.644
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thu, Jan 5, 2017 12:39 pm
Subject: RE: Order #81378/00 Model 64 S&W reported as stolen by DOJ
Hello,
We are still looking into it. It maybe that the reporting department had the wrong serial number. Majority of the revolvers are not engraved, only a few hundred were. The revolver that is being questioned came from California Health Care Facility in Stockton.
When I hear something new, I will let you know.
Have a good day,
Daniella Escobedo
LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY
1088 N FIRST STREET
SAN JOSE CA 95112
[PHONE] 408.294.2677 [FAX] 408.294.6444
To: office@lcaction.com
Subject: Re: Order #81378/00 Model 64 S&W reported as stolen by DOJ
I'm checking in to see if you might have any info on this.
also, I'm interested if you can tell me what department turn in this revolver? It is not marked with the CDC info nor does it have the scribed inventory number on the butt like the others do.
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2016 1:22 pm
Subject: RE: Order #81378/00
Hello,
Thank you for the information. I will follow up with EOU and let you know what I hear back.
Thank you,
Daniella Escobedo
LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY
1088 N FIRST STREET
SAN JOSE CA 95112
[PHONE] 408.294.2677 [FAX] 408.294.6444
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,869,264
Posts: 25,157,375
Members: 358,862
Active Members: 5,667
Welcome to our newest member, 1776 Arms.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 14131 users online. 134 members and 13997 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment