Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Gardena Shenanigans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John1960
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 73

    Gardena Shenanigans

    I wonder how much trouble these two got in? Who needs the Marketplace when you have Instagram? I guess it takes over 100 to catch the ATF's attention......

    Two Officers with Gardena Police Department Named in Federal Indictment that Allges They Operated Illegal Firearms Businesses
    LOS ANGELES – Two members of the Gardena Police Department were charged by a federal grand jury with participating in a scheme in which they purchased "off-roster" firearms not available to the general public and illegally operated businesses that resold the weapons.

    The two police officers were charged in a five-count indictment that was unsealed Friday afternoon. The indictment alleges that the officers conspired with each other and that each engaged in the business of dealing in firearms without a license.

    The two officers are collectively charged with illegally selling approximately 100 firearms, mostly .38-caliber pistols. The two defendants are:

    • Carlos Miguel Fernandez, 42, of Norwalk, whose Instagram handle was "the38superman," and

    • Edward Yasushiro Arao, 47, of Eastvale.

    Both defendants have been summoned to appear on April 3 for arraignments in United States District Court.

    According to the indictment, Fernandez advertised firearms for sale – guns being offered by both himself, Arao and others – on his Instagram account. The vast majority of posts on the account contained images of firearms. Arao, who was the CEO of Ronin Tactical Group, which was a federal firearms licensee (FFL), similarly advertised guns on the company’s Instagram account. Additionally, both defendants marketed firearms at gun shows. Neither defendant was licensed individually to engage in the business of dealing in firearms when the illegal gun sales alleged in the indictment took place.

    Fernandez allegedly purchased "off-roster" firearms – mostly Colt .38-caliber handguns that were not available to the general public, but which could be legally purchased by law enforcement officers – and sold dozens of these weapons through private-party transfers. Similarly, Arao obtained "off-roster" weapons by transferring them to himself individually from the inventory of Ronin Tactical Group. Through messages on Instagram and other means, Fernandez and Arao negotiated the prices

    and terms of firearm sales, and they accepted payment for the guns once they were delivered, according to the indictment.

    The indictment in this case was unsealed Friday afternoon after two other defendants in the case were arraigned in federal court on charges that they engaged in a "straw purchase" transaction involving a gun sold through Fernandez. The indictment alleges that Oscar Morales Camacho Sr., 63, of Salinas, falsely certified that he was purchasing a firearm for himself in a 2017 private-party transfer, when he in fact was buying the gun for his son, Oscar Maravilla Camacho Jr., 34, also of Salinas. Camacho Jr. has a prior criminal conviction that prohibits him from possessing firearms. The indictment alleges that Fernandez and both Camachos "well knew [that] defendant Camacho Sr. was not the actual buyer of the firearm."

    At their arraignments last week, both Camachos entered not guilty pleas and were ordered to stand trial on May 31.

    The indictment alleges a second "straw purchaser" transaction in which a South Los Angeles woman allegedly purchased two firearms for her boyfriend. As in the other straw purchase alleged in the indictment, Bianca Elizabeth Ibarria, 23, and Adalberto deJesus Vasquez Pelayo Jr., 24, also of South Los Angeles, are charged with making a false statement in a federal firearm licensee’s records during purchase of a firearm. Ibarria and Pelayo also have been directed to appear in federal court for arraignments on April 3.

    An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless proven guilty in court.

    Each count in the indictment carries a statutory maximum penalty of five years in federal prison. Therefore, if convicted of all charges, Fernandez would face up to 15 years in federal prison, and Arao could be sentenced to as much as 10 years.

    This case is being investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The Gardena Police Department provided its full cooperation during the investigation.

    The prosecution is being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Katherine A. Rykken of the Major Frauds Section.


    Last edited by John1960; 03-26-2018, 10:13 PM. Reason: Easier to read.....source inserted...
  • #2
    esy
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 1191

    Well, they're still awaiting to be arraigned; however, if I were a gambling man, I would bet that they're probably on leave without pay at the very least.

    The roster, for the most part, is silly and has gotten a handful of officers in quite a bit of trouble. Working OT is easier, safer, and clearly more legal. Not worth it in the least.

    Comment

    • #3
      Rogue187
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2007
      • 1157

      When you gotta out stupid another department and officers you do this.

      If you sell off infrequently then you probably would attract no attention. But if you going full on stupid you do it this way..

      Great way to lose everything for a few bucks.


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • #4
        SonofWWIIDI
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Nov 2011
        • 21583

        Sorry, not sorry.
        🎺

        Dear autocorrect, I'm really getting tired of your shirt!

        Comment

        • #5
          WyattandDoc
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2013
          • 767

          OK, Devil's Advocate.

          The Straw Purchase charge is very clear. If that can be proven, they're cooked. No "Gray Area" there.

          But as far as the sales of legally purchased handguns, I'm thinking they could walk. If I buy 1 Off Roster firearm a week for 100 weeks, test them, hate them and then sell them VIA Legal PPT, what am I guilty of?
          Knives don't stab people, cars don't drive drunk, eating utensils don't make you fat and pencils don't mis-spell words.

          Comment

          • #6
            esy
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2012
            • 1191

            Originally posted by WyattandDoc
            OK, Devil's Advocate.

            The Straw Purchase charge is very clear. If that can be proven, they're cooked. No "Gray Area" there.

            But as far as the sales of legally purchased handguns, I'm thinking they could walk. If I buy 1 Off Roster firearm a week for 100 weeks, test them, hate them and then sell them VIA Legal PPT, what am I guilty of?

            Comment

            • #7
              003
              Veteran Member
              • Jul 2010
              • 3436

              It appears the Feds are relying on the fact that the involved officers sold a number of guns in new condition and they did not have FFL’s, hence being in the business of selling firearms without the necessary federal license.

              Comment

              • #8
                CBR_rider
                Veteran Member
                • Jan 2013
                • 2698

                LOL; apparently they didn't get the memo...
                Originally posted by bwiese
                [BTW, I have no problem seeing DEA Agents and drug cops hanging from ropes, but that's a separate political issue.]
                Stay classy, CGF and Calguns.

                Comment

                • #9
                  TrailerparkTrash
                  Veteran Member
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 4249

                  Originally posted by WyattandDoc
                  OK, Devil's Advocate...

                  But as far as the sales of legally purchased handguns, I'm thinking they could walk. If I buy 1 Off Roster firearm a week for 100 weeks, test them, hate them and then sell them VIA Legal PPT, what am I guilty of?
                  sigpic

                  It`s funny to me to see how angry an atheist is over a God they don`t believe in.` -Jack Hibbs

                  -ΙΧΘΥΣ <><

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    I Swan
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 8770

                    Originally posted by WyattandDoc
                    OK, Devil's Advocate.

                    The Straw Purchase charge is very clear. If that can be proven, they're cooked. No "Gray Area" there.

                    But as far as the sales of legally purchased handguns, I'm thinking they could walk. If I buy 1 Off Roster firearm a week for 100 weeks, test them, hate them and then sell them VIA Legal PPT, what am I guilty of?
                    CA law only allows 5 PPT transactions a year by a non FFL. I doubt they were selling 20+ guns per PPT. Also if they were they surely would have attracted ATF attention as purchases of more than one handgun at a time are reported to them.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Burbur
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 1258

                      We have know for about a year that ATF and CA DOJ were working on this, and they stated the enforcement priority threshold was 100 (off-roster) sales, as there were numerous cases that exceeded this that were under current investigation.

                      Seems we've only heard of a few indictments, so they're probably still working on that case load.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        edgerly779
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                        CGN Contributor
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 19871

                        They were jealous of all the money the Pasadena cop was making doing same thing.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          haodoken
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2007
                          • 516

                          Good for them. We don't need any more bad apples with NO integrity on the job. Just for money of all things. No better than the d-bags we arrest.
                          sigpic

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            retired
                            Administrator
                            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                            • Sep 2007
                            • 9409

                            I predict the only thing to happen to them will be termination from their dept., fines, probation and not permitted to own firearms.

                            I know this is about a different item, but it's why I make my prediction. There was a certain female deputy who was served an arrest and search warrant outside of security at MCJ in L.A. years ago. She had baggies of cocaine she was bringing in to sell to inmates secreted in her back pack. She had been doing this for some time IIRC. They went to her car and besides a scale and more baggies, she also had a kilo of coke.

                            She was allowed to resign in lieu of being fired and was given probation. Every deputy I asked stated she should have been sent to prison.

                            I hope I'm wrong about the Gardena officers. If convicted, they should do the time IMO. They should also be terminated from their dept., not allowed to resign.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Samuelx
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2010
                              • 1558

                              Originally posted by retired
                              She was allowed to resign in lieu of being fired and was given probation. Every deputy I asked stated she should have been sent to prison.
                              Who was she related to/friends with/bumping uglies with? SMH...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1