Hello everyone. I'm new here and I had a question (out of sheer curiosity) regarding retired LEOs and California's gun laws.
I've asked around and I have been getting a lot of different (often times conflicting) answers. I won't bore you guys with too many details. I'll just ask them straight up:
1) Are former LEOs (including retirees and those who left in good standing) allowed to keep "assault weapons" and "high-capacity" magazines after retirement or leaving their department? I read that they weren't somewhere but I also read somewhere else that it was okay and I remember hearing that nut job Chris Dorner was fired from the LAPD and legally had "assault weapons" from when he was a cop.
2) What defines an "honorably retired" police officer in terms of ccw? I've heard that you need to have ten years as an LEO and that you need to have left in good standing. I heard also that in California it was only five. I also heard in California that you needed five years with a department and that you need to be at least 50 years old to qualify? The last one makes no sense to me since I know plenty of retired LEOs in New York (in counties that aren't ccw friendly) that are definitely under 50 who carry legally under LEOSA.
Sorry for being a bit long winded but I am terribly confused right now. Would someone please be kind enough to clarify all of this for me? Thanks!
I've asked around and I have been getting a lot of different (often times conflicting) answers. I won't bore you guys with too many details. I'll just ask them straight up:
1) Are former LEOs (including retirees and those who left in good standing) allowed to keep "assault weapons" and "high-capacity" magazines after retirement or leaving their department? I read that they weren't somewhere but I also read somewhere else that it was okay and I remember hearing that nut job Chris Dorner was fired from the LAPD and legally had "assault weapons" from when he was a cop.
2) What defines an "honorably retired" police officer in terms of ccw? I've heard that you need to have ten years as an LEO and that you need to have left in good standing. I heard also that in California it was only five. I also heard in California that you needed five years with a department and that you need to be at least 50 years old to qualify? The last one makes no sense to me since I know plenty of retired LEOs in New York (in counties that aren't ccw friendly) that are definitely under 50 who carry legally under LEOSA.
Sorry for being a bit long winded but I am terribly confused right now. Would someone please be kind enough to clarify all of this for me? Thanks!

Comment