Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Another Nail in the Coffin

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AR15Man
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 116

    Another Nail in the Coffin

    I've seen numerous Citizens and LEO's murdered by both legal and illegal aliens, now the CA PC MANDATES A PLEA OR OTHER REDUCTION IN A CHARGING DOCUMENT IN ORDER TO AVOID A CRIMINAL ALIEN'S DEPORTATION.

    What a travesty of justice.

    New Law: Plea Bargains Must Try To Avoid Deportation
    December 27, 2015
    [By Marc Debbaudt]

    In my continuing quest to educate the public about the legislature’s new sanctuary from safety philosophy, I turn my attention to a new law that goes into effect on January 1, 2016 that creates a double standard for United States citizens and non-citizens in this country (aka “illegal aliens” or “undocumented aliens”).

    Governor Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill 1343, authored by Assemblymember Tony Thurmond (D-Richmond). This bill imposed a new requirement on prosecutor’s statewide, requiring prosecutors to structure pleas bargains that seek to avoid deportation of non-citizens who plead guilty to crimes committed in California. Section 1016(3)(b) is added to the Penal Code, to read: “The prosecution, in the interests of justice, and in furtherance of the findings and declarations of Section 1016.2, shall consider the avoidance of adverse immigration consequences in the plea negotiation process as one factor in an effort to reach a just resolution.”

    It’s outrageous — the Legislature has declared that prosecutors MUSTtry to avoid a plea agreement that would lead to deportation! In other words, prosecutors should give illegal aliens a better plea deal than citizens in an effort to avoid deportation of an illegal alien who has committed a crime. What possible justification can there be for the Legislature to elevate illegal aliens above citizens, that would mandate prosecutors to provide a better plea deal for an illegal alien than they would a citizen simply to have the illegal alien not face the deportation consequence of their criminal act?

    Since state law will now mandate that prosecutors must try to avoid a plea deal that leads to deportation, will defense attorneys or Judges be allowed to make the DDA state what consideration they gave to immigration consequences when making a plea deal? Are elected District Attorneys now going to have to put in writing office policies to implement this new law? Will citizens who commit the same crime as illegal aliens be able to claim they are being denied equal protection under the law, that their status as citizen makes them subject to harsher punishment than an illegal alien?

    The reality is that any policy that turns a blind eye to illegal activities – including those that make it easier for people who have been convicted of crimes to remain in this country illegally -is a bona fide threat to public safety.

    This new law is similar to SB 1310 which Gov. Brown signed into law a year ago. That bill reduced the maximum sentence for a misdemeanor from 365 days to 364 days. Why the one-day reduction? Because under federal law a sentence of 365 days or more classifies a crime as an aggravated felony, triggering deportation hearings for noncitizen legal immigrants.

    One must ask – what was the true motivation behind these two pieces of legislation?

    Marc Debbaudt is President of the Association of Deputy District Attorneys. He can be contacted at mdebbaudt@laadda.com. The view and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of ADDA, which represents nearly 1,000 Los Angeles Deputy District Attorneys.

    By Marc DebbaudtIn my continuing quest to educate the public about the legislature’s new sanctuary from safety philosophy, I turn my attention to a new law that goes into effect on January 1,…
  • #2
    Garand1911
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2002
    • 1443

    SICKENING !!
    "I saved your life, AND brought you pizza" -- Me

    Comment

    • #3
      King of the 109ers
      Member
      • Sep 2015
      • 335

      I thought the entire Plea Bargaining thing was entirely unofficial, since any reasonable person would consider most of it just plain old Blackmail, and if any other Agreement was made in the real world under such terms it would be voided for "undo duress".

      So how can you pass a law about something that officially doesn't really exist?

      And wouldn't this violate any DA's Oath of Office for all sorts of reasons? Not sure what that Oath is but I'd guess its got stuff about doing their best to protect the public, which means hitting 'em as hard as you can with the laws you got.

      What about Equal Protection? Now as a non-alien I don't have this weapon against The People when I'm out committing crime. Its just not fair!

      Just says "consider", so I guess the DA can "consider" then decide they "just can't go there" out of concern for Public Safety, although they would no doubt be on the Do Not Promote list in NWO politics.
      Last edited by King of the 109ers; 01-07-2016, 7:11 AM.

      Comment

      • #4
        TrailerparkTrash
        Veteran Member
        • Oct 2005
        • 4249

        Thank your local democrat
        sigpic

        It`s funny to me to see how angry an atheist is over a God they don`t believe in.` -Jack Hibbs

        -ΙΧΘΥΣ <><

        Comment

        • #5
          CBR_rider
          Veteran Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 2706

          To paraphrase an old political thinker, people in a democracy get the government they deserve...
          Originally posted by bwiese
          [BTW, I have no problem seeing DEA Agents and drug cops hanging from ropes, but that's a separate political issue.]
          Stay classy, CGF and Calguns.

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1