Bear with me hear. I’ve taken some great leaps in assumptions but it’s mathematically possible for a USAR PV1 to get paid more than a USAR O2 for drills and annual training.
Presuming that the minimal 1 weekend a month and 2 weeks a year (WILD ASSUMPTION) holds fast and the PV1 gets a re-enlistment bonus (wild assumption again that someone held down at PV1 can reenlist, but not impossible) of the recent $20K for specific MOS’s then you apply that $20K the PVT makes going forward for his future drills/annual training, well, on a daily basis, it’s more than a 3yr TIS 1LT which could technically find himself in the position of CO (not impossible in the USAR).
I was just crunching numbers of more realistic scenarios for my SSG's that re-enlisted are making more than me when considering the bonus, and played with opening up those assumptions as much as I could, and it got all the way down to a PV1 being able to match new 1LT pay wise if the actual drill days are limited to the minimum.
Presuming that the minimal 1 weekend a month and 2 weeks a year (WILD ASSUMPTION) holds fast and the PV1 gets a re-enlistment bonus (wild assumption again that someone held down at PV1 can reenlist, but not impossible) of the recent $20K for specific MOS’s then you apply that $20K the PVT makes going forward for his future drills/annual training, well, on a daily basis, it’s more than a 3yr TIS 1LT which could technically find himself in the position of CO (not impossible in the USAR).
I was just crunching numbers of more realistic scenarios for my SSG's that re-enlisted are making more than me when considering the bonus, and played with opening up those assumptions as much as I could, and it got all the way down to a PV1 being able to match new 1LT pay wise if the actual drill days are limited to the minimum.
Comment