Schoenthal v. Raoul sensitive places Chicago.

[Sgt Raven]

Schoenthal v. Raoul sensitive places Chicago. District Court Judge Iain Johnston spanks the Government.

[Dvrjon]

Schoenthal v. Raoul sensitive places Chicago. District Court Judge Iain Johnston spanks the Government.

State filed another notice on Rahimi. https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...9397.106.0.pdf

The Court was unamused. https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...9397.107.0.pdf

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, July 24, 2024:
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Ms. Foxx's notice of supplemental authority [106] is stricken. The Court is aware of Rahimi and has already denied two motions raised in light of Rahimi. The Court is making every effort to issue its opinion in a timely manner, and these filings are hindering those efforts. Please stop.

[Sgt Raven]

^^^^^^^^
That was the polite way of the Judge saying STFD & STFU...

[Rickybillegas]

I like it. AG's across the blue states are going half crazed trying to make their supposed point about Rahimi and no 'historical twin' required. By their reckoning, anything they say is close to similar suffices.
Like gold rush days in Ca. somebody (Rahimi) struck the motherlode and a mad dash ensues. Letters of supplemental authority that beg this point have been flying off the desks of blue state AGs'
ever since the June 21 ruling. Hopefully more Judges will seek to calm their frenzy down a bit so that the real business of determining 'broad history and tradition of regulation' can be done adequately and respecting
the true analysis required by BRUEN.