Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

New Law Review Article by C.D Michel & Konstadinos Moros

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BAJ475
    Calguns Addict
    • Jul 2014
    • 5031

    New Law Review Article by C.D Michel & Konstadinos Moros

    An outstanding Law Review Article by C.D Michel & Konstadinos Moros in the Wyoming Law Review. Title: Restrictions ?Our Ancestors Would Never Have Accepted?: The Historical Case Against Assault Weapon Bans

    The definitive answer to those who ask, "why do you need and AR?" It is also very strong support for the conclusion that any legislator, executive officer and judge that proposes, votes for, signs or upholds an assault weapon ban has affirmatively declared that they are one of the tyrants the 2A was adopted to protect us from.

    See https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/cgi...98&context=wlr
  • #2
    yacko
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2019
    • 600

    Interesting read.

    Comment

    • #3
      Maltese Falcon
      Ordo Militaris Templi
      CGN Contributor
      • Feb 2009
      • 6574

      Thank you. Goes into my Law file.

      Yow....Lot's of interesting articles: https://network.bepress.com/law/constitutional-law/

      .
      Last edited by Maltese Falcon; 02-16-2024, 1:58 PM.

      Comment

      • #4
        AlmostHeaven
        Veteran Member
        • Apr 2023
        • 3808

        Bravo! Gun owners across the nation should feel blessed to have such scholarly lawyers fighting to preserve, defend, and restore the fundamental right to keep and bear arms.

        I highly recommend following @MorosKostas on X/Twitter at https://twitter.com/@MorosKostas.
        A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

        The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

        Comment

        • #5
          pacrat
          I need a LIFE!!
          • May 2014
          • 10254

          Originally posted by BAJ475
          An outstanding Law Review Article by C.D Michel & Konstadinos Moros in the Wyoming Law Review. Title: Restrictions ?Our Ancestors Would Never Have Accepted?: The Historical Case Against Assault Weapon Bans

          The definitive answer to those who ask, "why do you need and AR?" It is also very strong support for the conclusion that any legislator, executive officer and judge that proposes, votes for, signs or upholds an assault weapon ban has affirmatively declared that they are one of the tyrants the 2A was adopted to protect us from.

          See https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/cgi...98&context=wlr
          Well stated Sir. For those Americans ignorant enough to ask such an asinine question. And in rebuttal of all those leftist politicos that claim "no one needs an AR-14 to hunt with".


          There are thousands of internet vids with Americans protecting their livestock, property, and livelihood. Against hogs and predators, using those same evil arms of war.

          Comment

          • #6
            BAJ475
            Calguns Addict
            • Jul 2014
            • 5031

            Originally posted by pacrat
            Well stated Sir. For those Americans ignorant enough to ask such an asinine question. And in rebuttal of all those leftist politicos that claim "no one needs an AR-14 to hunt with".


            There are thousands of internet vids with Americans protecting their livestock, property, and livelihood. Against hogs and predators, using those same evil arms of war.
            Including one showing Kyle Rittenhouse shooting hogs from a helicopter. Kyle has, in fact, personally demonstrated two different lawful uses of AR style rifles! All we need is a video of Kyle shooting a 3-Gun match.

            Comment

            • #7
              AlmostHeaven
              Veteran Member
              • Apr 2023
              • 3808

              Originally posted by pacrat
              Well stated Sir. For those Americans ignorant enough to ask such an asinine question. And in rebuttal of all those leftist politicos that claim "no one needs an AR-14 to hunt with".


              There are thousands of internet vids with Americans protecting their livestock, property, and livelihood. Against hogs and predators, using those same evil arms of war.
              Never forget. The legislators who write gun laws know this much about our constitutionally protected arms.

              A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

              The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1