Hanson v DC: Large-cap mags DIst Ct of DC 2023

[Librarian]

https://t.co/wxpzSShayY (Court Listener link)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ANDREW HANSON, et al., :
:
Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 22-2256 (RC)
:
v. : Re Document No.: 8
:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., :
:
:
Defendants. :
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DENYING PLAINTIFFS? MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Notable to me because Contreras favors the garbage from Immergut in Oregon Firearms Federation.

So, on to trial, I guess.

[ritter]

Much interest balancing and misses the common use test entirely.

[BobB35]

And this shows why this is a complete mess...does SCOTUS allow this crap to go on for another decade and allow circuit courts to violate the law. Or do they drop the hammer?

Dude didn't even make an attempt to follow Bruen. Went straight to law from the 1920 and 1930 and said yep a magazine ban is OK. Wow...

And the court also keeps pointing to that ruling of out OR.

Come on Benetiz!!

[ritter]

And this shows why this is a complete mess...does SCOTUS allow this crap to go on for another decade and allow circuit courts to violate the law. Or do they drop the hammer?

Quite likely the former. They've shown no interest in intervening in lower courts schedules. So, until one makes it through appeals and cert is granted (if it's granted), we wait. BS, yes. But also apparent reality.

[Bhobbs]

Another case where Scalia’s tissue paper soft ruling in Heller resulted in harm to the 2nd amendment.