Here is the case
This is how they will twist things and find bans constitutional. This will have to go to SCOTUS to clarify.
The case finds laws says minors can not buy guns. At the time a minor was considered anyone under 21. Therefore 18-20 yr olds can't buy guns.
But the age of adulthood has changed to 18 now so what is the analogue? This is dishonest at best and nefarious at the worst.
And it's all based in the Jim Crow laws during reconstruction.
This is how they will twist things and find bans constitutional. This will have to go to SCOTUS to clarify.
The case finds laws says minors can not buy guns. At the time a minor was considered anyone under 21. Therefore 18-20 yr olds can't buy guns.
But the age of adulthood has changed to 18 now so what is the analogue? This is dishonest at best and nefarious at the worst.
And it's all based in the Jim Crow laws during reconstruction.
Comment