Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

OR Fed and State suits vs OR mag ban (Measure 114) Enjoined in state ct

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Librarian
    Admin and Poltergeist
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Oct 2005
    • 44629

    OR Fed and State suits vs OR mag ban (Measure 114) Enjoined in state ct

    RECAP link to complaint https://t.co/wyupagv4VA

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    DISTRICT OF OREGON
    PENDLETON DIVISION

    OREGON FIREARMS FEDERATION,
    INC. an Oregon public benefit corporation;
    BRAD LOHREY, SHERMAN COUNTY
    SHERIFF; and ADAM JOHNSON, an
    individual,
    Plaintiffs,
    v.
    KATE BROWN, GOVERNOR OF THE
    STATE OF OREGON, in her official
    capacity; and ELLEN ROSENBLUM,
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
    OF OREGON, in her official capacity,
    Defendants.
    Compare to the original Duncan complaint, http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/..._Complaint.pdf

    In Federal District Court in Portland, before Judge Immergut, are

    OFF v Brown

    Fitz v Brown https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...70381.15.0.pdf

    Eyre et al v Rosenblum https://t.co/RyZmfpJINp

    Azzopardi et al v Rosenblum https://t.co/jQRDPdCeH2

    And, in State Court in Harney County, before Judge Raschio, is Arnold v Brown. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documen...vrosenblum.pdf
    Last edited by Librarian; 12-15-2022, 6:11 PM.
    ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

    Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!
  • #2
    BAJ475
    Calguns Addict
    • Jul 2014
    • 5066

    Originally posted by Librarian
    RECAP link to complaint https://t.co/wyupagv4VA

    Compare to the original Duncan complaint, http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/..._Complaint.pdf
    As usual, you are on top of events. Question, I wonder if they would allow me, as an Idaho resident, to become a plaintiff given that I have an Oregon CHL and my carry guns have magazines that exceed 10 rounds in capacity and Oregon is now infringing on my right to travel with my lawfully possessed and legally carried firearms based solely on the capacity of the magazines these firearms came with.

    Comment

    • #3
      pacrat
      I need a LIFE!!
      • May 2014
      • 10259

      What about the "OTHER PROVISIONS" aka "INFRINGEMENTS" included in 114?

      Are civil rights orgs there going to just nibble around the edges of this Crap Pie?

      Comment

      • #4
        Aragorn
        Member
        • Feb 2013
        • 354

        Admin. Glendora Concealed Carry
        Gun Owners of America, Life Member
        2nd Amendment Foundation, Life Member
        Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, Life Member
        Arizona Citizens Defense League, Life Member
        Lone Star Gun Rights, Member
        NRA Benefactor Life Member

        Comment

        • #5
          9Cal_OC
          Calguns Addict
          • Apr 2019
          • 6666

          Freedom isn't free...

          sigpic

          iTrader

          Comment

          • #6
            TrappedinCalifornia
            Calguns Addict
            • Jan 2018
            • 8533

            Hunters Fear 'End Of Firearm Sales' Until Oregon Creates Gun Permit System

            I know this has been touched on in other threads related to Oregon's Measure 114, but I thought it worthy of it's own thread.

            Hunters fear 'end of firearm sales' until Oregon creates gun permit system

            Gun rights advocates fear all firearm sales will freeze in Oregon in three weeks when one of the nation's strictest gun control measures takes effect.

            Measure 114, which voters appear to have been passed by a 1.5% margin, bans ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds and mandates the creation of a permit-to-purchase system that includes hands-on firearm training...

            Oregon State Police announced this week that Measure 114 will take effect Dec. 8.

            Fox News asked OSP in an email whether firearm purchases will halt on that date if a permit processing system is not yet in place. A spokesperson for the agency said only that "OSP is working diligently to ensure that the new Permit to Purchase program will be operational by December 8, 2022."...

            Patrick said gun stores are preparing for the worst-case scenario, telling customers they may have to stop selling firearms next month.

            "That also means that Oregonians cannot go out of state to purchase firearms either," Patrick said. "We're basically being held hostage by 114 because firearms dealers have to respect the laws of a person's home state."...

            Comment

            • #7
              Gavelek
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2012
              • 1275

              You voted you got it

              Comment

              • #8
                Librarian
                Admin and Poltergeist
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Oct 2005
                • 44629

                Originally posted by Gavelek
                You voted you got it
                Portland voted, 959K to 930K, assisted by the usual pack of lies and refusal of TV to accept opposition ads.
                ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

                Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                Comment

                • #9
                  Striker62
                  CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                  CGN Contributor
                  • May 2016
                  • 328

                  USN 1982-1989 / ARNG 1999 - 2001
                  GCA / NRA / CRPA / CMP Forum Mod
                  -----------------------------------------------
                  iTrader Feedback:
                  https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...iker62-itrader

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Librarian
                    Admin and Poltergeist
                    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 44629

                    Originally posted by pacrat
                    What about the "OTHER PROVISIONS" aka "INFRINGEMENTS" included in 114?

                    Are civil rights orgs there going to just nibble around the edges of this Crap Pie?
                    It seems that the permit to purchase provisions cannot go into effect until a bunch of infrastructure is in place, and that cannot happen until the legislature appropriates money for that stuff.

                    If one cannot actually comply, one cannot rationally (sorry, I do remember this is gun law) be prosecuted for non-compliance, so there is no one who has standing, right?

                    Besides that, 'official' notice that it passed was Thursday the 17th. Are we there yet? Are we there yet?
                    ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

                    Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      press1280
                      Veteran Member
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 3023

                      Aside from the obvious 2A, the legislature also screwed up by not even having a grandfather clause?

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        tedw
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2010
                        • 507

                        Kudos to:

                        OREGON FIREARMS FEDERATION,
                        INC. an Oregon public benefit corporation;
                        BRAD LOHREY, SHERMAN COUNTY
                        SHERIFF; and ADAM JOHNSON, an
                        individual,
                        Plaintiffs,

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Librarian
                          Admin and Poltergeist
                          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                          • Oct 2005
                          • 44629

                          Originally posted by press1280
                          Aside from the obvious 2A, the legislature also screwed up by not even having a grandfather clause?
                          114 is not a product of the Legislature, but rather Giffords and Bloomberg's groups. The Portland LEVO sponsors are just fig-leaves.
                          ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

                          Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Dan_Eastvale
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Apr 2013
                            • 9640

                            Originally posted by press1280
                            Aside from the obvious 2A, the legislature also screwed up by not even having a grandfather clause?

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              pacrat
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • May 2014
                              • 10259

                              Apparently a Cnty Sheriff is onboard with this suit against 114.

                              https://www.usnews.com/news/politics...TLAND%2C%20Ore.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1