What's up with ATF's stabilizing brace regs?

[Experimentalist]

I can appreciate there may be unique circumstances where acceptance or denial of registration may be useful.

In the general case acceptance of registration means just what others here have pointed out, some clerk thought the application worthy of acceptance.

Weren't there instances of CA DOJ showing up at people's homes to inspect certain entries? Pretty sure there were.

[Dr.Lou]

You've stumbled upon their evil plan.

Good job, Scooby!

[jcwatchdog]

I can appreciate there may be unique circumstances where acceptance or denial of registration may be useful.

In the general case acceptance of registration means just what others here have pointed out, some clerk thought the application worthy of acceptance.

Weren't there instances of CA DOJ showing up at people's homes to inspect certain entries? Pretty sure there were.

[beanz2]

[beanz2]

How does registering it like that affect your ability to transfer it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Fate]

You still riding old CGF hasbeen jock? That dude is no hero. And he (like the OP stated) was off topic.

[Lanejsl]

Looks like they are planning to make the brace ban effective 8/22.

[foreppin916]

I registered an AR pistol as a BBAW with an SBm4 (non adjustable) attached and noted in the registration it was an arm brace.

It was accepted.

It is now an form 1'd approved AOW.

no issues with DOJ......................yet.

Do you mean they registered it as a BBRAW? What he is talking about is registering it federally as an NFA item Ayo W


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[vandal]

It is now an form 1'd approved AOW.

That's awesome as CADOJ can't try to charge you with CA SBR, as AOWs are exempted from CA SBR laws. Well done.

I tried to do the same but ATF just sat on it for months and then told me to resubmit.

[Dr.Lou]

According to a discussion I recently had with a couple ATF folks, it's still working its way through main justice, state department, etc. It's decision is scheduled to be published in August.

[M1NM]

1-30-22

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-federal-register-publishes-schedule-for-atfs-firearm-silencer-and-pistol-brace-final-regulations/

BREAKING: Federal Register Publishes Schedule For ATF’s Firearm, Silencer, and Pistol Brace Final Regulations

page 357 (5111) https://cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com/w...ations-Doc.pdf

They also want to redefine what makes a receiver so swapping uppers or having uppers as "parts" will be a thing of the past.

Stage 104. Definition of ‘‘Frame or Receiver’’ and Identification of Firearms

new regulatory definitions of firearm frame or receiver and frame or receiver because they are outdated.

[Silence Dogood]

1-30-22

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-federal-register-publishes-schedule-for-atfs-firearm-silencer-and-pistol-brace-final-regulations/

https://cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com/w...ations-Doc.pdf

They also want to redefine what makes a receiver so swapping uppers or having uppers as "parts" will be a thing of the past.

Risks: Without this rule, public safety will continue to be threatened by the lack of traceability of firearms.

Can someone else confirm or deny this with citable sources that explicitly say?

[Silence Dogood]

spirit of the prohibition against a Federal registry of gun owners even if it does not break the letter of the law, could this new rule-making be the step too far taken by the other side which gives 2A defenders what we need to win a SC case solidifying our right to self/home-made arms.