Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Chicago Reinstates Gun and Ammunition Tax After Court Deems It Unconstitutional

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TrappedinCalifornia
    Calguns Addict
    • Jan 2018
    • 8100

    Chicago Reinstates Gun and Ammunition Tax After Court Deems It Unconstitutional

    Chicago reinstates gun and ammunition tax after court deems it unconstitutional

    The Cook County Board of Commissioners reinstated its firearm and ammunition tax after it was struck down by the Illinois Supreme Court in October.

    During Thursday's board of commissioners meeting, members voted to approve an amendment to a previous ordinance dealing with how firearms and ammunition are taxed in order to comply with an Oct. 21 Illinois Supreme Court ruling...

    Under the ordinance, retail purchases are subject to a $25 tax for each firearm purchased. Centerfire ammunition is taxed at $0.05 per cartridge, and rimfire ammunition is taxed at $0.01 per cartridge.

    The board voted to tax firearms in 2012 and amended the tax in 2015 to include ammunition...
    The case being referred to is... GUNS SAVE LIFE, INC., et al. v. ZAHRA ALI, Director of the Department of Revenue of Cook County, et al.

    More details can be found in a Chicago Tribune piece linked to in the FOX News Report... Cook County guns and ammo tax, struck down by Illinois Supreme Court, is back on the books for now after Thursday board vote

    ...In a 12-2 vote, with three commissioners absent, the county board approved the amendment, which states all revenue from the firearm and ammunition tax must go toward programs or operations geared toward gun violence prevention. The passage follows an Oct. 21 ruling from the state’s highest court that found the levy was unconstitutional...

    The board’s two Republican commissioners, Sean Morrison and Peter Silvestri, opposed the amendment. Before the vote, Morrison read a separate opinion from Illinois Supreme Court Justice Michael Burke that said, “The majority’s analysis wrongly leaves the door open for a municipality to enact a future tax on firearms or ammunition that is more narrowly tailored to the purpose of ameliorating the cost of gun violence.”

    Burke also wrote, “The only problem with that approach is that it would still violate the Illinois Constitution.”...

    Commissioner Larry Suffredin, a Democrat and vocal gun control advocate, brushed off Morrison’s warnings. He noted that Burke was acting as a “lone justice” when he issued his opinion against future taxes with a narrower focus.

    “Commissioner Morrison tries to literally read a Supreme Court decision without understanding the interaction of the constitution,” Suffredin said. “We are well within the time frame that is allowed under the law. We are acting in good faith here.”
    Last edited by TrappedinCalifornia; 11-06-2021, 6:14 AM.
  • #2
    rplaw
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 1808

    They found weasel words and have turned them into a loophole that will result in another lawsuit which they will lose after spending a few hundred thousand in tax dollars defending it.
    Some random thoughts:

    Somebody's gotta be the mole so it might as well be me. Seems to be working so far.

    Evil doesn't only come in black.

    Life is like a discount bakery. Usually everything is just what you ordered. But, occasionally you come face to face with an unexpected fruitcake. Surprise!

    My Utubery

    Comment

    • #3
      ja308
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Nov 2009
      • 12660

      Judge Roy Bean once supposedly ripped a page out of a law book after a lawyer showed him the law.
      He replied " Thats a damned poor law "

      Its probably time elected republicans follow Chicago's lead and do what's right. Instead of following stupid laws, passed by those who will enslave us.

      Comment

      • #4
        Dan_Eastvale
        Calguns Addict
        • Apr 2013
        • 9111

        Judge Roy Bean and Sheriff Joe Arpaio are showcase Americans

        Comment

        • #5
          M1NM
          Calguns Addict
          • Oct 2011
          • 7966

          Originally posted by rplaw
          They found weasel words and have turned them into a loophole that will result in another lawsuit which they will lose after spending a few hundred thousand in tax dollars defending it.
          They will use their own city/county lawyers. In the meantime they'll collect $1 on every box of centerfire ammo and 5.00 on a brick of 22 add the $25 per gun and the 2-3 year time frame and they'll be getting a lot of cash.

          Comment

          • #6
            ja308
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Nov 2009
            • 12660

            Originally posted by Dan_Eastvale
            Judge Roy Bean and Sheriff Joe Arpaio are showcase Americans
            Where did Joe Arpaio ignore a law ?

            Comment

            • #7
              NavCop
              Junior Member
              • Nov 2019
              • 61

              Chicago's politicians know better than anyone else - that's why their city is such a paradise.

              Comment

              • #8
                aklon
                Veteran Member
                • Jan 2007
                • 3002

                San Leandro has this law on the books even though they ran the last gun shop out of town ten years ago. While it was in effect, every pressure group in town was trying to get its hands on "the gun tax money."

                That's what they called it and that's how they saw it, and if you think Chicago is going to spend any large part of this money on "gun crime victims" I have a bridge to sell you.
                Freedom is the dream you dream while putting thought in chains.

                - Giacomo Leopardi

                Comment

                • #9
                  TrappedinCalifornia
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Jan 2018
                  • 8100

                  Originally posted by aklon
                  San Leandro has this law on the books even though they ran the last gun shop out of town ten years ago. While it was in effect, every pressure group in town was trying to get its hands on "the gun tax money."

                  That's what they called it and that's how they saw it, and if you think Chicago is going to spend any large part of this money on "gun crime victims" I have a bridge to sell you.
                  From the Chicago Tribune piece in the OP...

                  Right now, they are simply attempting to do an end around on the decision by making it appear as though they are in compliance with it. But, just as California typically does, I'm sure that, sooner rather than later, it will be swept into their equivalent of a 'general fund' and there will be no determining what, exactly, it was spent on or whose pockets it made it to.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    p7m8jg
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 1914

                    Court decision clearly gave them the opening. Chicago just followed what the court said in their opinion.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      HibikiR
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2014
                      • 2417

                      How hard would it be for a watchdog group to monitor the proposed spending?

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Full Clip
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 10260

                        Can't let some pesky constitution written by a bunch of dead white men slow their agenda...

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Batman
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 2401

                          Wondering when the first lawyer will do a class action suit to get the money back for their clients that buy guns and ammo.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            dfletcher
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Dec 2006
                            • 14771

                            What was the purpose of filing suit against the ordinance as originally worded and operated if such an obvious and easily obtained work around was available to Chicago?

                            Substantial time, effort and money spent to overturn an ordinance that took no time, little effort and money to reinstate?
                            GOA Member & SAF Life Member

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              DentonandSasquatchShow
                              Senior Member
                              • Jun 2018
                              • 1278

                              Contempt of court. The electric chair should do the trick.
                              I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.

                              The last time I had faith in the News was when it was with Huey Lewis.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1